PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2015Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance28 citationsOpen Access

Prognostic value of pulmonary vein size in prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study

THThomas H. HauserVEVidal EssebagFBFerdinando Baldessin

Structured PICO

Does larger pulmonary vein size measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance predict atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation?

P
Population
71 consecutive patients prior to pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation
I
Intervention
First-pass contrast enhanced pulmonary vein magnetic resonance angiography to measure pulmonary vein diameter and cross-sectional area
O
Outcome
Any symptomatic or asymptomatic atrial fibrillation >10s (early recurrence ≤30 days, late recurrence >30 days) at 1 yearhard clinical

Larger pulmonary vein size measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance prior to ablation is independently associated with late recurrent atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between pulmonary vein (PV) anatomy and successful catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is poorly understood METHODS: First-pass contrast enhanced PV magnetic resonance angiography was performed in 71 consecutive patients prior to PV isolation. PV diameter and cross-sectional area (CSA) were measured prior to PV isolation. Any symptomatic or asymptomatic AF >10s was considered a recurrence. Early recurrence was defined as recurrent AF ≤30 days after PV isolation, while late recurrence of AF was defined as recurrent AF >30 days after. RESULTS: At 1 year, 57% had any recurrence of AF while 41% had late recurrence of AF. Study subjects with one or more PV diameter in the top 10(th) percentile had trend toward more early recurrent AF (HR 1.99, p = 0.053). Study subjects with one or more PV CSA in the top 10th percentile had more late recurrent AF (HR 2.25, p = 0.039) and a trend toward more early recurrent AF (HR 1.94, p = 0.064). With multivariate analysis, PV size was not associated with early recurrent AF, but late recurrent AF was associated with one or more large PV, increased left atrial size, and non-paroxysmal AF. Study subjects with all three of these risk factors had a 100% rate of late recurrent AF at 1 year, while those with none had a 7% rate of late recurrent AF. CONCLUSIONS: Larger PV size is independently associated with more late recurrent AF after PV isolation. Determination of PV size prior to PV isolation may predict procedural success.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hauser et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a70f68198c9a8aa45ac74https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0151-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper