PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 17, 2012The International Journal of Human Resource Management27 citationsOpen Access

Comparing and explaining HR department effectiveness assessments: evidence from line managers and trade union representatives

View Full Paper
SWSophie De WinneJDJeroen DelmotteCGCaroline Gilbert

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We compare and explain effectiveness assessments of two HR stakeholders: line managers and trade union representatives. We examine whether they have the same preferences regarding the roles the HR department has to fulfil (Ulrich 1997). Next, we test which strong HRM system characteristics (Bowen and Ostroff 2004) are decisive in determining the perceived effectiveness of the HR department in the preferential roles. With these analyses we examine whether the HR roles and strong HRM system characteristics are equally important to different stakeholders. Results show that the perceived effectiveness of the HR department in its operational roles is decisive in trade union representatives' general HR effectiveness assessment. For line managers, process-oriented roles are crucial. Next, if the HR department scores high on strong HRM system characteristics, it is perceived as more effective in its HR roles. Yet, the importance of specific HRM system characteristics depends on the role and stakeholder.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Winne et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a79b18198c9a8aa45b759https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.725069
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper