PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 20, 2007BMJ107 citationsOpen Access

Competing risks of mortality with marathons: retrospective analysis

DRDonald A. RedelmeierSunnybrook Health Science CentreJGJ Ari GreenwaldHamilton Health Sciences

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the risk of sudden cardiac death during organized marathons compared to the risk of motor vehicle fatalities due to road closures.
  • Conducted a population-based retrospective analysis of marathons with at least 1000 participants between 1975-2004 in the United States.

Structured PICO

Does running in an organized marathon increase the societal risk of sudden death compared to expected motor vehicle fatalities?

P
Population
3,292,268 runners participating in marathons with at least 1000 participants, two decades of history, on public roads in the United States, 1975-2004.
I
Intervention
Running in an organized marathon (with associated road closures)
C
Comparator
Expected motor vehicle fatalities if roads had not been closed
O
Outcome
Sudden death attributed to cardiac causes or to motor vehicle traumahard clinical

Organized marathons are not associated with an increase in sudden deaths from a societal perspective, as the risk of sudden cardiac death is offset by the reduction in motor vehicle fatalities due to road closures.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine from a societal perspective the risk of sudden cardiac death associated with running in an organised marathon compared with the risk of dying from a motor vehicle crash that might otherwise have taken place if the roads had not been closed. DESIGN: Population based retrospective analysis with linked ecological comparisons of sudden death. SETTING: Marathons with at least 1000 participants that had two decades of history and were on public roads in the United States, 1975-2004. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sudden death attributed to cardiac causes or to motor vehicle trauma. RESULTS: The marathons provided results for 3,292,268 runners on 750 separate days encompassing about 14 million hours of exercise. There were 26 sudden cardiac deaths observed, equivalent to a rate of 0.8 per 100,000 participants (95% confidence interval 0.5 to 1.1). Because of road closure, an estimated 46 motor vehicle fatalities were prevented, equivalent to a relative risk reduction of 35% (95% confidence interval 17% to 49%). The net reduction in sudden death during marathons amounted to a ratio of about 1.8 crash deaths saved for each case of sudden cardiac death observed (95% confidence interval: 0.7 to 3.8). The net reduction in total deaths could not be explained by re-routing traffic to other regions or days and was consistent across different parts of the country, decades of the century, seasons of the year, days of the week, degree of competition, and course difficulty. CONCLUSION: Organised marathons are not associated with an increase in sudden deaths from a societal perspective, contrary to anecdotal impressions fostered by news media.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Redelmeier et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bc8e10a1f7575939ce80bhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39384.551539.25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper