PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2021JACC Asia30 citationsOpen Access

Photoplethysmography-Based Machine Learning Approaches for Atrial Fibrillation Prediction

YGYutao GuoHWHao WangHZHui Zhang

Structured PICO

Does a photoplethysmography-based machine learning model accurately predict atrial fibrillation onset in advance in patients with paroxysmal AF?

P
Population
50 adults with paroxysmal AF (mean age 67 ± 12 years, 40% women). Key inclusion: adult age (≥18 years) and paroxysmal AF without current onset of AF. Exclusion: age <18 years, presence of a pacemaker, and persistent/permanent AF. (Model was previously optimized in 554 individuals from the Huawei Heart Study across China).
I
Intervention
Optimized machine learning-based model (M2) using continuous photoplethysmography (PPG) monitoring signals from a smart wrist band to predict AF onset.
C
Comparator
Continuous 72-hour Holter electrocardiography (ECG) monitoring (criterion standard).
O
Outcome
Prediction of AF onset 0 to 4 hours before AF onset, evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy.surrogate

A machine learning model utilizing continuous photoplethysmography signals from smart wearables can accurately predict the onset of atrial fibrillation up to 4 hours in advance.

Limitations

  • Feasibility of the use of AI models in clinical practice needs to be investigated
  • Large prospective cohort studies and randomized trials are needed to clarify clinical utility

Abstract

Background: Current wearable devices enable the detection of atrial fibrillation (AF), but a machine learning (ML)-based approach may facilitate accurate prediction of AF onset. Objectives: The present study aimed to develop, optimize, and validate an ML-based model for real-time prediction of AF onset in a population at high risk of incident AF. Methods: A primary ML-based prediction model of AF onset (M1) was developed on the basis of the Huawei Heart Study, a general-population AF screening study using photoplethysmography (PPG)-based smart devices. After optimization in 554 individuals with 469,267 PPG data sets, the optimized ML-based model (M2) was further prospectively validated in 50 individuals with paroxysmal AF at high risk of AF onset, and compared with 72-hour Holter electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring, a criterion standard, from September 1, 2019, to November 5, 2019. Results: Among 50 patients with paroxysmal AF (mean age 67 ± 12 years, 40% women), there were 2,808 AF events from a total of 14,847,356 ECGs over 72 hours and 6,860 PPGs (45.83 ± 13.9 per subject per day). The best performance of M1 for AF onset prediction was achieved 4 hours before AF onset (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.94; 95% confidence interval: 0.93-0.94). M2 sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy (at 0 to 4 hours before AF onset) were 81.9%, 96.6%, 96.4%, 83.1%, and 88.9%, respectively, compared with 72-hour Holter ECG. Conclusions: The PPG- based ML model demonstrated good ability for AF prediction in advance. (Mobile Health mHealth technology for improved screening, patient involvement and optimizing integrated care in atrial fibrillation; ChiCTR-OOC-17014138).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Guo et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1cb6857a95e6b4c589a28fhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.09.004
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper