PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2006Psychosomatic Medicine261 citations

The Role of Angry Rumination and Distraction in Blood Pressure Recovery From Emotional Arousal

View Full Paper
WGWilliam GerinKDKarina W. DavidsonNCNicholas Christenfeld

Structured PICO

Does distraction improve blood pressure recovery following emotional arousal in subjects?

P
Population
60 subjects
I
Intervention
12-minute recovery period with distractions after an anger-recall task
C
Comparator
12-minute recovery period without distractions after an anger-recall task
O
Outcome
Blood pressure recovery (assessed as area under the curve for systolic and diastolic blood pressure)surrogate

Distraction during recovery from emotional arousal improves blood pressure recovery, particularly in individuals with a high tendency to ruminate.

Abstract

Objective: Cardiovascular recovery of prestress baseline blood pressure has been implicated as a possible additional determinant of sustained blood pressure elevation. We hypothesize that angry ruminations may slow the recovery process. Method: A within-subjects design was used in which resting baseline blood pressure and heart rate measurements were assessed on 60 subjects, who then took part in two anger-recall tasks. After each task, subjects sat quietly and alone during a 12-minute recovery period randomized to with or without distractions. During baseline, task, and recovery, blood pressure was continuously monitored; during recovery, subjects reported their thoughts at five fixed intervals. Results: Fewer angry thoughts were reported in the distraction condition (17%) compared with no distraction (31%; p = .002); an interaction showed that this effect was largely the result of the two intervals immediately after the anger-recall task. Trait rumination interacted with distraction condition such that high ruminators in the no-distraction condition evidenced the poorest blood pressure recovery, assessed as area under the curve (p = .044 systolic blood pressure and p = .046 diastolic pressure). Conclusions: People who have a tendency to ruminate about past anger-provoking events may be at greater risk for target organ damage as a result of sustained blood pressure elevations; the effect is exacerbated when distractions are not available to interrupt the ruminative process. ANOVA = analysis of variance; AUC = area under the curve; BP = blood pressure; HTN = hypertension; CHD = coronary heart disease; CVR = cardiovascular reactivity; CVD = cardiovascular disease; HR = heart rate; DAB-VR = Destructive Anger Behavior-Verbal Rumination; DBP = diastolic BP; HPA = hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal; SBP = systolic BP.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gerin et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d261f68a6eca4522f4210https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000195747.12404.aa
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper