PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 24, 2012American Journal of Clinical Pathology28 citations

Fluorescence Microscopy Is Superior to Polarized Microscopy for Detecting Amyloid Deposits in Congo Red–Stained Trephine Bone Marrow Biopsy Specimens

View Full Paper
AMAlan MarcusESEvita SadiminMRMaurice D. Richardson

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The classic gold standard for detecting amyloid deposits is Congo red-stained bright field and polarized microscopy (CRPM). A prior study showed that Congo red fluorescence (CRF) microscopy had increased sensitivity compared with traditional CRPM when analyzing fat pad specimens. The purpose of the current study was to determine the sensitivity of CRF for evaluating Congo red-stained bone marrow biopsy specimens, and to compare these results with those of CRPM. We compared the CRPM and the CRF analyses of 33 trephine bone marrow biopsy specimens with clinical or morphologic suspicion of amyloid deposits. These results were verified against immunohistochemical staining with anti-amyloid P antibody. CRF achieved 100% sensitivity, and CRPM achieved 75% sensitivity. Both groups showed 100% specificity compared with amyloid P immunohistochemical staining. The results show that CRF is a sensitive method to analyze trephine bone marrow biopsy specimens for amyloid deposits.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marcus et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d8b855b7fddc352056c05https://doi.org/10.1309/ajcp6hzi5ddqtcrm
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper