PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2001Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology77 citationsOpen Access

Circadian Behavior of P‐Wave Duration, P‐Wave Area, and PR Interval in Healthy Subjects

View Full Paper
PDPolychronis DilaverisPFPatrik FärbomVBVelislav N. Batchvarov

Key Result

In healthy subjects, P-wave duration, P area, and PR interval, along with their relations to RR interval, demonstrated significant circadian variation (P<0.0001 for P area and PR interval).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=50)

Structured PICO

P
Population
50 healthy volunteers (25 men, mean age 34 +/- 10 years)
I
Intervention
24-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) recording with digital 12-lead Holter recorders
O
Outcome
Circadian variation of P-wave duration, P area, and PR interval and of their linearly fitted relation with RR intervalsurrogate

P-wave duration, P area, and PR interval demonstrate significant circadian variation in healthy subjects, which may be relevant for assessing dynamic atrial fibrillation risk.

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.0001

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prolongation of P-wave duration has long been shown to indicate the presence of high risk for atrial fibrillation. The circadian variation of P-wave characteristics and their dynamic adaptation to heart rate changes was not tested before. METHODS: To evaluate the diurnal pattern of P-wave duration, P area, and PR interval and of their linearly fitted relation with RR interval, 50 healthy volunteers (25 men, mean age 34 +/- 10 years) underwent 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) recording with digital 12-lead Holter recorders. The median P-wave duration, P area, and PR interval were calculated from the average 12-lead ECG constructed from each 10-second ECG recording. Single harmonic regression analysis was performed to reveal the presence of circadian variation in the aforementioned ECG parameters. RESULTS: The P area (P < 0.0001, R(2) = 0.78), the PR interval (P < 0.0001, R(2) = 0.92), the P area / RR slope (P < 0.0001, R(2) = 0.55), and the PR/RR slope (P < 0.0001, R(2) = 0.42) showed a highly significant circadian variation while the periodic nature of P-wave duration (P = 0.016, R(2) = 0.32) and of the P duration / RR slope (P = 0.011, R(2) = 0.18) was only indicated by harmonic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: P-wave duration, P area, and PR interval show a significant circadian variation in healthy subjects. The relations between P area/RR,PR/ RR, and P duration/RR also demonstrate a significant diurnal pattern.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dilaveris et al. (2001) conducted an observational in Healthy subjects (n=50). 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) recording was evaluated on Circadian variation of P-wave duration, P area, and PR interval (p=<0.0001). In healthy subjects, P-wave duration, P area, and PR interval, along with their relations to RR interval, demonstrated significant circadian variation (P<0.0001 for P area and PR interval).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d90a528423f2ce5053860https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-474x.2001.tb00092.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper