PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 5, 2015Journal of the American Geriatrics Society50 citations

Values of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire in Individuals with Dementia

View Full Paper
HMHui‐Fen MaoCKChun‐An KuoWHWen‐Ni Wennie Huang

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q), a widely used measure of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSDs) and associated caregiver stress. DESIGN: Ten registered nurses rated the severity of BPSDs and caregiver distress using the NPI-Q during six monthly assessments and an external reference, a 7-point Likert-type global rating of BPSDs change during five monthly assessments from the second to the sixth month. An anchor-based (global ratings of change) approach and a distribution-based (standard error of measurement) approach were used to determine the MCID for the NPI-Q severity and distress subscales. SETTING: Long-term care facility. PARTICIPANTS: Nonbedridden residents with dementia (n = 45) and registered nurses (n = 10). MEASUREMENTS: NPI-Q (severity and caregiver distress subscales) and global ratings of changes in BPSDs on a 7-point Likert-type scale. RESULTS: The NPI-Q MCID ranges were 2.77 to 3.18 for severity and 3.10 to 3.95 for distress. Residents in the highest NPI-Q tertile at baseline had higher MCID severity (3.62) and distress (5.08) scores than those in the lowest tertile (severity (2.40), distress (3.10)). CONCLUSION: This study provides an estimate of the MCID for severity and distress subscales of the NPI-Q, which can help clinicians and researchers determine whether NPI-Q change scores within a group of individuals with dementia are beyond measurement error and are clinically important.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mao et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ec4f0534fa33580a40f36https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13473
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper