PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2005Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention166 citations

Dietary Glycemic Load, Carbohydrate, Sugar, and Colorectal Cancer Risk in Men and Women

View Full Paper
DMDominique S. MichaudCFCharles S. FuchsSLSimin Liu

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Hyperinsulinemia may explain excess colorectal cancer among individuals who are overweight or inactive. Recent studies have observed elevated colorectal cancer risk among individuals with elevated insulin levels 2 hours after oral glucose challenge or with elevated plasma C-peptide levels. The effect of consuming a high glycemic diet on colorectal risk, however, remains uncertain. Two prospective cohort studies, the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, contributed up to 20 years of follow-up. After exclusions, 1,809 incident colorectal cancers were available for analyses. Dietary glycemic load (GL) was calculated as a function of glycemic index (postprandial blood glucose response as compared with a reference food), carbohydrate content, and frequency of intake of individual foods reported on food frequency questionnaires. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to adjust for potential confounders. Intakes of dietary carbohydrate, GL, overall glycemic index, sucrose, and fructose were not associated with colorectal cancer risk in women. A small increase in risk was observed in men with high dietary GL (multivariate relative risk, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.79; highest versus lowest quintile), sucrose or fructose (multivariate relative risk, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.78; highest versus lowest quintile of fructose, P = 0.008). Associations were slightly stronger among men with elevated body mass index (> or =25 kg/m(2)). Results among women were similar after stratifying by body mass index or physical activity. High intakes of GL, fructose, and sucrose were related to an elevated colorectal cancer risk among men. For women, however, these factors did not seem to increase the risk of colorectal cancer.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Michaud et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2004857213e52ab104a7f8https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.138.14.1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Dietary Sugar, Glycemic Load, and Pancreatic Cancer Risk in a Prospective Study2002 · 240 citations
  2. 2Colorectal Cancer: Another Complication of Diabetes Mellitus?1998 · 276 citations
  3. 3Aspirin Use and the Risk for Colorectal Cancer and Adenoma in Male Health Professionals1994 · 794 citations
  4. 4Physical activity and incidence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women1991 · 1,174 citations
  5. 5The effect of protein ingestion on the metabolic response to oral glucose in normal individuals1986 · 143 citations