PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 24, 1999JAMA116 citations

Should the Electrocardiogram Be Used to Guide Therapy for Patients With Left Bundle-Branch Block and Suspected Myocardial Infarction?

View Full Paper
MSMichael G. Shlipak

Key Result

An ECG algorithm for predicting MI in patients with LBBB had a sensitivity of only 10% (95% CI 2-26%), resulting in lower projected stroke-free survival than universal thrombolysis.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=83)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does an ECG algorithm improve stroke-free survival compared to universal thrombolysis in patients with LBBB and suspected MI?

P
Population
83 patients with LBBB presenting 103 times with symptoms suggestive of MI at a university emergency department.
E
Exposure
Electrocardiogram (ECG) algorithm used as a screening test to guide thrombolysis.
C
Comparator
Universal thrombolysis (decision analysis model where all patients receive thrombolysis).
O
Outcome
Myocardial infarction determined by serial cardiac enzyme analyses and stroke-free survival.hard clinical

The evaluated ECG algorithm is a poor predictor of MI in patients with LBBB, suggesting that acute thrombolytic therapy should be considered for all such patients presenting with MI symptoms rather than relying on ECG screening.

Main Result

Effect estimate: Sensitivity 10% (95% CI 2-26)

Absolute Event Rate: 91.8% vs 92.9%

Abstract

CONTEXT: Recently, an algorithm based on the electrocardiogram (ECG) was reported to predict myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with left bundle-branch block (LBBB), but the clinical impact of this testing strategy is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic test characteristics and clinical utility of this ECG algorithm for patients with suspected MI. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study to which an algorithm was applied, followed by decision analysis regarding thrombolysis made with or without the algorithm. SETTING: University emergency department, 1994 through 1997. PATIENTS: Eighty-three patients with LBBB who presented 103 times with symptoms suggestive of MI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Myocardial infarction determined by serial cardiac enzyme analyses and stroke-free survival. RESULTS: Of 9 ECG findings assessed, none effectively distinguished the 30% of patients with MI from those with other diagnoses. The ECG algorithm indicated positive findings in only 3% of presentations and had a sensitivity of 10% (95% confidence interval, 2%-26%). The decision analysis showed that among 1000 patients with LBBB and chest pain, 929 would survive without major stroke if all received thrombolysis compared with 918 if the ECG algorithm was used as a screening test. CONCLUSIONS: The ECG is a poor predictor of MI in a community-based cohort of patients with LBBB and acute cardiopulmonary symptoms. Acute thrombolytic therapy should be considered for all patients with LBBB who have symptoms consistent with MI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Michael G. Shlipak (1999) conducted a cohort in Left bundle-branch block and suspected myocardial infarction (n=83). ECG algorithm vs. Universal thrombolysis (decision analysis) was evaluated on Myocardial infarction and stroke-free survival (Sensitivity 10%, 95% CI 2-26). An ECG algorithm for predicting MI in patients with LBBB had a sensitivity of only 10% (95% CI 2-26%), resulting in lower projected stroke-free survival than universal thrombolysis.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21e0460aaa557a9ec86e0bhttps://doi.org/10.1001/jama.281.8.714
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper