PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1999IEEE Transactions on Image Processing124 citations

Significance-linked connected component analysis for wavelet image coding

View Full Paper
BCBing-Bing ChaiJVJ. VassXZXinhua Zhuang

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Recent success in wavelet image coding is mainly attributed to a recognition of the importance of data organization and representation. There have been several very competitive wavelet coders developed, namely, Shapiro's (1993) embedded zerotree wavelets (EZW), Servetto et al.'s (1995) morphological representation of wavelet data (MRWD), and Said and Pearlman's (see IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., vol.6, p.245-50, 1996) set partitioning in hierarchical trees (SPIHT). We develop a novel wavelet image coder called significance-linked connected component analysis (SLCCA) of wavelet coefficients that extends MRWD by exploiting both within-subband clustering of significant coefficients and cross-subband dependency in significant fields. Extensive computer experiments on both natural and texture images show convincingly that the proposed SLCCA outperforms EZW, MRWD, and SPIHT. For example, for the Barbara image, at 0.25 b/pixel, SLCCA outperforms EZW, MRWD, and SPIHT by 1.41 dB, 0.32 dB, and 0.60 dB in PSNR, respectively. It is also observed that SLCCA works extremely well for images with a large portion of texture. For eight typical 256x256 grayscale texture images compressed at 0.40 b/pixel, SLCCA outperforms SPIHT by 0.16 dB-0.63 dB in PSNR. This performance is achieved without using any optimal bit allocation procedure. Thus both the encoding and decoding procedures are fast.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chai et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a223a8e3b8e99975a4ec261https://doi.org/10.1109/83.766856
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper