PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1997Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation161 citations

Cost-Effectiveness of Cardiac Rehabilitation After Myocardial Infarction

View Full Paper
PAPhilip A. AdesFPFredric J. PashkowJNJames R. Nestor

Key Result

Cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction provided an incremental life expectancy of 0.202 years over 15 years, with an estimated cost-effectiveness of 2,130 $/YLS in the late 1980s.

Key Points

  • This analysis evaluates the economic impact of cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction, focusing on cost per life year saved.
  • Calculated cost-effectiveness in dollars per year of life saved ($/YLS) based on mortality rates and patient charges.
  • Combined results from randomized trials and epidemiologic studies on postinfarction survival.
  • Performed sensitivity analysis to validate findings.
  • Participants gained an incremental life expectancy of 0.202 years over 15 years.
  • Cost effectiveness was $2,130/YLS in the late 1980s, rising to $4,950/YLS by 1995.
  • Cardiac rehabilitation proved more cost-effective than thrombolytic therapy, coronary bypass, and cholesterol lowering drugs.

Structured PICO

Is cardiac rehabilitation cost-effective after myocardial infarction?

P
Population
Post-myocardial infarction population evaluated for the cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation over a 15-year period.
I
Intervention
Cardiac rehabilitation
C
Comparator
No rehabilitation (implied by incremental life expectancy calculation) and comparison with other post-MI interventions (thrombolytic therapy, coronary bypass surgery, cholesterol lowering drugs, smoking cessation programs)
O
Outcome
Cost-effectiveness in dollars per year of life saved ($/YLS)

Cardiac rehabilitation is a highly cost-effective secondary prevention strategy after myocardial infarction, with a cost per year of life saved that compares favorably to other standard post-MI therapies.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation is commonly prescribed after myocardial infarction (MI) to coordinate exercise training and secondary preventive services. Cost-effectiveness analysis allows the quantitative comparison of the relative economic worth of cardiac rehabilitation in relation to other common interventions. METHODS: The cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation, in dollars per year of life saved (/YLS), was calculated by combining published results of randomized trials of cardiac rehabilitation on mortality rates, epidemiologic studies of long-term survival in the overall postinfarction population, and studies of patient charges for rehabilitation services and averted medical expenses for hospitalizations after rehabilitation. RESULTS: Cardiac rehabilitation participants experienced an incremental life expectancy of 0. 202 years during a 15-year period. In 1988, the average cost of rehabilitation and exercise testing was 1, 485, partially offset by averted cardiac rehospitalizations of 850 per patient. A cost-effectiveness value of 2, 130 /YLS was determined for the late 1980s, projected to a value of 4, 950 /YLS for 1995. A sensitivity analysis supports the study results. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with other post-MI treatment interventions, cardiac rehabilitation is more cost-effective than thrombolytic therapy, coronary bypass surgery, and cholesterol lowering drugs, though less cost-effective than smoking cessation programs. Cardiac rehabilitation should stand alongside these therapies as standard of care in the post-MI setting.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ades et al. (1997) studied Myocardial infarction. Cardiac rehabilitation vs. Other post-MI treatment interventions was evaluated on Cost-effectiveness in dollars per year of life saved ($/YLS). Cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction provided an incremental life expectancy of 0.202 years over 15 years, with an estimated cost-effectiveness of 2,130 $/YLS in the late 1980s.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a225f0b2a7728014877ade5https://doi.org/10.1097/00008483-199707000-00002
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cost-Effectiveness of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis2019 · 35 citations
  2. 2Cardiac rehabilitation — a cost analysis1991 · 134 citations
  3. 3Cardiac Rehabilitation for Persons with Stroke: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis2025 · 2 citations
  4. 4Cost-Effectiveness of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Older Adults With Coronary Heart Disease2023 · 14 citations
  5. 5Economic evaluation of cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review2005 · 74 citations