PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 5, 2026Radiation Protection Dosimetry0 citations

Can volumetric arc therapy be an alternative to brachytherapy in advanced cervical cancer radiotherapy?

View Full Paper
YBYılmaz BilekISI ̇smail Hakkı SarpünTKTimur Koca

Key Points

  • The study investigates whether volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) can effectively replace brachytherapy for advanced cervical cancer treatment.
  • Compared 3D brachytherapy and VMAT-generated stereotactic body radiotherapy plans.
  • Focused on patients with advanced cervical cancer and large tumor sizes.
  • Evaluated the feasibility based on dosimetric data.
  • VMAT showed comparable dosimetric outcomes to brachytherapy in certain cases.
  • SBRT may be a viable alternative to brachytherapy for large tumors as indicated by the dosimetric assessment.

Abstract

The preferred treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer, classified as IB2-IVA in Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics staging, has been external radiotherapy to the pelvis, cervix, uterus, and parametrium, combined with an additional dose of intracavitary brachytherapy (BRT). Occasionally, the treatment team may encounter patients who refuse treatment, large cervical tumours with extensive lateral parametrial involvement that are inaccessible for interstitial implant, or medical conditions that completely prevent the use of BRT. These challenging situations call for an alternative approach to deliver the intended therapeutic dose without adhering strictly to the belief that BRT is indispensable. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) as a substitute for BRT by comparing 3D BRT and VMAT-generated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plans, particularly for patients with advanced cervical cancer and large tumour sizes. Based on dosimetric data, SBRT may be a viable alternative to BRT if necessary.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bilek et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a22695a763171746d547eddhttps://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncag005
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper