PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 6, 2026Frontiers in Education0 citationsOpen Access

Perceived benefits and challenges of LLMs in programming education: a student-centered analysis

FPFarman Ali PirzadoAAAwais AhmedMWMohd Anas Wajid

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand how computer science students perceive large language models in their programming education.
  • Surveyed 300 undergraduate students from various institutions in Mexico.
  • Conducted t-tests for variable-wise comparisons including gender and institution type.
  • Used one-way ANOVA to assess differences based on semesters and levels of programming experience.
  • Students generally view LLMs as valuable tools but express concerns about over-reliance and security.
  • T-tests showed no significant differences in perceptions based on gender or institution type.
  • ANOVA revealed programming experience significantly shapes perceptions, with 1-2 years' experience indicating the highest engagement and trust.

Abstract

Introduction The rise of large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, Codex, and Copilot, has transformed programming and education, providing powerful tools that enhance code generation, debugging, and conceptual understanding. Despite their potential benefits, concerns have emerged about their impact on students' learning behaviors, including over-reliance, trust issues, and engagement. Exploring how computer science students perceive and interact with LLMs is crucial for ensuring that these tools support, rather than hinder, independent learning and critical thinking. Without careful consideration, the widespread adoption of LLMs in programming education may lead to unintended consequences, including weakened problem-solving skills and reduced confidence in coding abilities. Considering this, the study explores students' perceptions of the role of LLMs in programming education, focusing on key factors such as perceived support, skepticism, engagement, dependence, and trust. Methods To achieve this objective, we surveyed 300 undergraduate students from public and private institutions in Mexico. Overall perceptions were reported, and variable-wise comparisons—including gender and institution type were conducted using t-tests. One-way ANOVA was used to assess differences between semesters and levels of programming experience. Results The results showed that, while students generally view LLMs as valuable tools, concerns persist about over-reliance, accuracy, and security. T-tests revealed no significant differences based on gender or institution type. ANOVA results indicated that programming experience, not academic semester, gender, or institute, was a key factor shaping perceptions. Students with 1-2 years of programming experience reported the highest levels of perceived support, engagement, and trust. Discussion These findings underscore the importance of tailoring LLM integration strategies to students' prior experience to maximize benefits and mitigate risks in programming education.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pirzado et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a23b8c571a5da9775e74da5https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1814773
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper