PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 15, 2026Frontiers in Psychology1 citationsOpen Access

How does artificial intelligence literacy affect university students’ innovative behavior? A serial mediation analysis based on latent profiles

LMLei MaTLTianxing LiuCZChuyuan Zhao

Key Points

  • This study investigates how AI literacy affects university students' innovative behavior and the mechanisms underlying this relationship.
  • Cross-sectional survey of 1,040 university students in China
  • Data collection utilized AI Literacy Scale, AI Anxiety Scale, Cognitive Flexibility Scale, and Innovative Behavior Scale
  • Mediation and latent profile analyses were conducted to uncover relationships and subgroup differences.
  • AI literacy positively correlated with cognitive flexibility (r=0.346, p<0.001) and innovative behavior (r=0.329, p<0.001)
  • AI literacy negatively correlated with AI anxiety (r=-0.319, p<0.001)
  • Three latent profiles of AI literacy identified: low (15.29%), moderate (37.02%), high (47.69%).

Abstract

Purpose Against the backdrop of the rapid proliferation of generative artificial intelligence (AI), how university students can effectively leverage AI technologies to foster their innovative behavior has emerged as a critical issue in higher education. This study aims to explore the relationship and underlying mechanisms between AI literacy and university students’ innovative behavior. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1,040 university students in China. Data were collected using the AI Literacy (AIL) Scale, AI Anxiety (AIA) Scale, Cognitive Flexibility (CF) Scale, and Innovative Behavior (IB) Scale. Results AIL was significantly and positively correlated with CF ( r = 0.346, p 0.001) and IB ( r = 0.329, p 0.001), and significantly negatively correlated with AIA ( r = −0.319, p 0.001). Mediation analysis revealed three significant indirect pathways: the independent mediating effect of AIA accounted for 13.44% of the total effect, the independent mediating effect of CF accounted for 14.15%, and their serial mediating effect accounted for 3.30%. Additionally, latent profile analysis identified three latent profiles of AI literacy: low AI literacy (15.29%), moderate AI literacy (37.02%), and high AI literacy (47.69%). Significant differences were observed in the serial mediation pathways across these distinct profiles. Conclusion AIL was directly associated with university students’ IB and showed indirect associations through the independent and serial mediation of AIA and CF. These findings extend the application of affordance theory in human-AI collaboration contexts and provide empirical evidence for higher education institutions to implement differentiated AI education and innovation cultivation strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2f9621a1cfeec490827b8bhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1844997
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper