PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 2010Circulation513 citations

Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation for Failed Bioprosthetic Heart Valves

View Full Paper
John G. Webb
John G. WebbInterventional / Structural Cardiology
DWDavid WoodAmerican College of CardiologyJYJian YeCardiac Surgery

Key Result

Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failed bioprostheses was successful, with 91.7% of high-risk patients alive with satisfactory valve function at a median follow-up of 135 days.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=24)

Structured PICO

Does transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation provide a safe and effective alternative for high-risk patients with failed bioprosthetic heart valves?

P
Population
24 high-risk patients with failed bioprosthetic heart valves undergoing transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation, followed for a median of 135 days.
E
Exposure
Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation
O
Outcome
Procedural success, mortality, valve function, and NYHA functional classhard clinical

Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation is a feasible and effective less-invasive alternative for high-risk patients with failed bioprosthetic heart valves across all four valve positions.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The majority of prosthetic heart valves currently implanted are tissue valves that can be expected to degenerate with time and eventually fail. Repeat cardiac surgery to replace these valves is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Transcatheter heart valve implantation within a failed bioprosthesis, a "valve-in-valve" procedure, may offer a less invasive alternative. METHODS AND RESULTS: Valve-in-valve implantations were performed in 24 high-risk patients. Failed valves were aortic (n=10), mitral (n=7), pulmonary (n=6), or tricuspid (n=1) bioprostheses. Implantation was successful with immediate restoration of satisfactory valve function in all but 1 patient. No patient had more than mild regurgitation after implantation. No patients died during the procedure. Thirty-day mortality was 4.2%. Mortality was related primarily to learning-curve issues early in this high-risk experience. At baseline, 88% of patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV; at the last follow-up, 88% of patients were in class I or II. At a median follow-up of 135 days (interquartile range, 46 to 254 days) and a maximum follow-up of 1045 days, 91.7% of patients remained alive with satisfactory valve function. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation is a reproducible option for the management of bioprosthetic valve failure. Aortic, pulmonary, mitral, and tricuspid tissue valves were amenable to this approach. This finding may have important implications with regard to valve replacement in high-risk patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Webb et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Failed bioprosthetic heart valves (n=24). Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation was evaluated on Survival with satisfactory valve function at follow-up. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failed bioprostheses was successful, with 91.7% of high-risk patients alive with satisfactory valve function at a median follow-up of 135 days.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a430b4c5a8279e76234fb3bhttps://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.109.924613
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper