PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 17, 2026Journal of European Public Policy0 citationsOpen Access

The inequality of EU digital sovereignty: core, periphery, and digital divides in EU politics

View Full Paper
JEJakub Eberle

Key Points

  • The article examines how the EU's pursuit of digital sovereignty interacts with intra-European inequalities and its implications for policy legitimacy.
  • Adopted a socio-material approach and a normative perspective.
  • Utilized mixed methods to analyze allocation of EU funding and infrastructures and composition of business networks.
  • Investigated discourse produced within EU networks and debates.
  • Identified a paradox where EU initiatives intended to enhance sovereignty actually worsen digital divides.
  • Highlighted issues of legitimacy concerning EU digital policies that may undermine cohesion.
  • Provided insights from digital colonialism and capitalism literature to support the findings.

Abstract

This article interrogates the relationship between the EU’s strive for digital sovereignty (DS) and the existing intra-European inequalities. Adopting a socio-material approach and a normative perspective, it focuses on two aspects of the problem: redistribution of resources and infrastructures, and representation within EU networks and debates. Mixed methods are used to bring evidence concerning the allocation of EU funding and infrastructures, as well as the composition of business networks and the character of discourse produced within them. While the results are not uniform, the overall findings suggest an inherent paradox in the EU digital sovereignty agenda: the very initiatives that are supposed to make Europe sovereign, secure and competitive in relation to external powers may have the opposite results within the EU, contributing to growing digital divides. This is an issue for the legitimacy of EU digital policies, even potentially further undermining the cohesion of the EU as such. Apart from highlighting a politically relevant problem, the article contributes to the existing DS scholarship by bringing in insights from literatures on digital colonialism and digital capitalism, thereby advancing the recent calls for the development of a critical perspective on digital sovereignty.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jakub Eberle (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a59c5e4a58755010b4712a5https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2026.2701223
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Digital sovereignty - Rhetoric and reality2024 · 72 citations
  2. 2Sending Signals or Building Bridges? Digital Sovereignty in EU Communicative and Co‐Ordinative Discourse2024 · 9 citations
  3. 3Diluting digital sovereignty: Czechia’s quiet selective adaptation to EU digital politics2025 · 2 citations
  4. 4Data Grab2024 · 141 citations
  5. 5Transnational governance of digital transformation: financing innovation in Europe’s periphery2023 · 16 citations