PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1994AJP Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology57 citations

Fractal nature of short-term systolic BP and HR variability during lower body negative pressure

View Full Paper
GBG. C. ButlerYYYoshiharu YamamotoRHRichard L. Hughson

Key Result

Lower body negative pressure up to -50 mmHg significantly increased the 1/f beta slope of heart rate variability from 1.16 to 1.68, while the slope for blood pressure variability remained unchanged.

Structured PICO

Does orthostatic stress induced by lower body negative pressure alter the fractal characteristics of short-term systolic blood pressure and heart rate variability in healthy men?

P
Population
8 healthy men subjected to lower body negative pressure to assess heart rate and blood pressure variability.
E
Exposure
Lower body negative pressure (LBNP) protocol consisting of 20 min supine rest followed sequentially by 10 min at each of -5, -15, -25, -40, and -50 mmHg LBNP and 10 min supine recovery
C
Comparator
Baseline supine rest
O
Outcome
Fractal characteristics (1/f beta slope) of short-term systolic blood pressure variability (BPV) and heart rate variability (HRV)surrogate

Orthostatic stress alters the fractal complexity of heart rate variability but not blood pressure variability, highlighting differences in their physiological control mechanisms.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 1.68% vs 1.16%

Abstract

We have shown previously that the heart rate variability (HRV) signal is fractal in nature with a high degree of complexity, as given by the calculated fractal dimension (DF). We have also reported that loss of complexity, as indicated by a reduction in DF of HRV, is associated with orthostatic hypotension and impending syncope. To extend this investigation of cardiovascular responses, we have investigated the signal characteristics of short-term systolic blood pressure variability (BPV) coincident with measurements of HRV during orthostatic stress. Eight healthy men completed a test protocol of 20 min supine rest followed sequentially by 10 min at each of -5, -15, -25, -40, and -50 mmHg lower body negative pressure (LBNP) and 10 min supine recovery. We found that resting BPV and HRV were fractal with approximately 70% of both variables in the fractal component of the variability signal. The slope of the 1/f beta relationship was 1.16 +/- 0.12 for HRV and 2.31 +/- 0.17 for BPV. With increasing levels of orthostatic stress, the 1/f beta slope of HRV increased significantly to 1.68 +/- 0.08 at -50 mmHg LBNP, whereas the 1/f beta slope was unchanged for BPV. Indicators of parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous system activity derived from heart rate variability suggested reduced and increased values, respectively, as the LBNP increased. These data indicate important differences in heart rate and blood pressure control under orthostatic stress.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Butler et al. (1994) studied Healthy (n=8). Lower body negative pressure (LBNP) vs. Supine rest was evaluated on 1/f beta slope of heart rate variability (HRV) and blood pressure variability (BPV). Lower body negative pressure up to -50 mmHg significantly increased the 1/f beta slope of heart rate variability from 1.16 to 1.68, while the slope for blood pressure variability remained unchanged.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a61751cba6827eff93f4f77https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.1994.267.1.r26
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper