PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 16, 2010The Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry119 citations

The P4 Screener

PDPriyanka DubeGujarat UniversityKKKurt KroenkeRegenstrief InstituteMBMatthew J. BairRegenstrief Institute

Key Result

The P4 screener triggered a suicide assessment in 17.6% of primary care and 16.5% of oncology patients, with the majority classified as minimal risk and only 0.4% to 1.6% as higher risk.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=559)

Randomization

Randomized

Structured PICO

Does the P4 screener effectively assess potential suicide risk in primary care and oncology patients?

P
Population
559 primary care and oncology patients from two randomized trials, assessed for potential suicide ideation over 12 months.
I
Intervention
P4 screener (assessing past suicide attempts, suicide plan, probability of completing suicide, and preventive factors)
O
Outcome
Evaluation of preliminary evidence for the P4 screener as a brief measure to assess potential suicide riskpatient reported

The P4 screener may be a useful brief measure for assessing potential suicide risk in clinical care and research settings.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Depression is the most common mental disorder, and suicide is its most serious consequence. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate preliminary evidence for the P4 screener as a brief measure to assess potential suicide risk. METHOD: The P4 screener was prospectively evaluated in 2 randomized effectiveness trials of primary care (January 2005-June 2008; N = 250) and oncology patients (March 2006-August 2009; N = 309). Potential suicide ideation was assessed at 5 time points in both trials: baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The P4 screener asks about the "4 P's": past suicide attempts, suicide plan, probability of completing suicide, and preventive factors. Patients were classified as minimal, lower, and higher risk based upon responses to these 4 items. RESULTS: A suicide assessment was triggered 1 or more times by 17.6% (44 of 250) of Stepped Care for Affective Disorders and Musculoskeletal Pain (SCAMP) participants and 16.5% (51 of 309) of Indiana Cancer Pain and Depression (INCPAD) participants at some point in the trial. Of the patients who triggered a suicide assessment, the majority (29 of 44 in SCAMP and 27 of 51 in INCPAD) were classified as minimal risk by the algorithm. Only 1 (0.4%) of the SCAMP participants and 5 (1.6%) of the INCPAD participants were classified as higher risk. Among the latter, the most common factors preventing patients from attempting suicide were the "4 F's": faith, family, future hope, and fear of failing in their attempt. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings suggest that the P4 screener may be useful in assessing potential suicide risk in the clinical care of depressed patients as well as in clinical research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00118430 (SCAMP) and NCT00313573 (INCPAD).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dube et al. (2010) conducted an RCT in Depression and potential suicide risk (n=559). P4 screener was evaluated on Suicide assessment triggered and risk classification. The P4 screener triggered a suicide assessment in 17.6% of primary care and 16.5% of oncology patients, with the majority classified as minimal risk and only 0.4% to 1.6% as higher risk.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a63d1c92679aa42c5384e52https://doi.org/10.4088/pcc.10m00978blu
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper