PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1998Journal of Applied Physiology64 citations

Reflex responses to regional venous pooling during lower body negative pressure in humans

View Full Paper
JHJohn R. HalliwillLLLori A. LawlerTETamara J. Eickhoff

Structured PICO

Does preventing regional venous pooling with anti-shock trousers alter hemodynamic responses during lower body negative pressure in healthy individuals?

P
Population
16 healthy men and women
I
Intervention
Graded lower body negative pressure (LBNP) to 60 mmHg with medical anti-shock trousers inflated at the legs or legs and abdominopelvic region
C
Comparator
No trouser inflation (control) during LBNP
O
Outcome
Hemodynamic responses including heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and forearm vascular resistancesurrogate

The hemodynamic consequences of venous pooling in the abdominal and pelvic regions during lower body negative pressure are less pronounced than those in the legs.

Abstract

Lower body negative pressure is frequently used to simulate orthostasis. Prior data suggest that venous pooling in abdominal or pelvic regions may have major hemodynamic consequences. Therefore, we developed a simple paradigm for assessing regional contributions to venous pooling during lower body negative pressure. Sixteen healthy men and women underwent graded lower body negative pressure protocols to 60 mmHg while wearing medical anti-shock trousers to prevent venous pooling under three randomized conditions: 1) no trouser inflation (control), 2) only the trouser legs inflated, and 3) the trouser legs and abdominopelvic region inflated. Without trouser inflation, heart rate increased 28 +/- 4 beats/min, mean arterial pressure fell -3 +/- 2 mmHg, and forearm vascular resistance increased 51 +/- 9 units at 60 mmHg lower body negative pressure. With inflation of either the trouser legs or the trouser legs and abdominopelvic region, heart rate and mean arterial pressure did not change during lower body negative pressure. By contrast, although the forearm vasoconstrictor response to lower body negative pressure was attenuated by inflation of the trouser legs (delta forearm vascular resistance 33 +/- 10 units, P < 0.05 vs. control), attenuation was greater with the inflation of the trouser legs and abdominopelvic region (delta forearm vascular resistance 16 +/- 5 units, P < 0.05 vs. control and trouser legs-only inflation). Thus the hemodynamic consequences of pooling in the abdominal and pelvic regions during lower body negative pressure appear to be less than in the legs in healthy individuals.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Halliwill et al. (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6fabd587f92105712741c8https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1998.84.2.454
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Subcutaneous and skeletal muscle vascular responses in human limbs to lower body negative pressure1992 · 22 citations
  2. 2Hysteresis in response to descending and ascending lower-body negative pressure1987 · 18 citations
  3. 3External negative pressure transiently reduces intravenous pressure and augments the arteriovenous pressure gradient in the affected limb segment2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Differential effects of lower body negative pressure on forearm and calf blood flow1986 · 32 citations
  5. 5Lower limb hemodynamics during lower body negative pressure and the impact of pre-conditioning exercise2025