PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1989Psychology and Marketing30 citations

Effects of debriefing in marketing research involving “Mild” deceptions

View Full Paper
DTDaniel R. ToyJOJ. Rolf OlsenLWLauren Wright

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Although behavioral researchers in marketing frequently deceive their subjects, relatively few report postexperimental debriefings. We hypothesize that researchers may avoid debriefings because (a) they feel their deceptions are so minor that debriefings are unnecessary, and (b) they fear possible negative reactions when subjects learn of the deceptions. We present the results of an experiment in which we measured debriefing effects on subjects who received such “mild” deceptions. Our results suggest that researchers have little to fear from conducting debriefings in these situations. We conclude by making several suggestions for administering debriefings and by identifying several issues concerning the effects of debriefings and deceptions that warrant future research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Toy et al. (1989) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7039ce75498292b7099f6bhttps://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220060105
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper