PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 1965Journal of General Microbiology69 citations

A Comparison by the Use of Gel Electrophoresis of Soluble Protein Components and Esterase Enzymes of some Group D Streptococci

View Full Paper
BLBarbara M. Lund

Key Points

  • Compare soluble protein components and esterase enzyme profiles across strains of Streptococcus faecalis, Streptococcus faecium, and Streptococcus durans using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
  • Extracted soluble cellular constituents from multiple strains of S. faecalis, S. faecium, and S. durans representing diverse serotypes and varieties.
  • Separated cell constituents using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by differential staining to detect total protein and esterase enzyme bands.
  • Streptococcus faecalis strains produced consistent protein profiles across serotypes and varieties, while displaying protein and esterase patterns distinct from S. faecium and S. durans.
  • Major protein bands of S. faecium and S. durans differed in electrophoretic mobility from S. faecalis, and both species exhibited weaker overall esterase activity with mostly faint bands.
  • An atypical motile strain of S. faecium exhibited unique protein and esterase band patterns that differed from all other evaluated strains.

Abstract

SURMMARY Soluble cell constituents of strains of Streptococcus faecalis, S. faecium and S. durans were studied by electrophoresis in polyaery lamide gels followed by staining the gel to reveal the patterns of separated proteins and esterase enzymes. The patterns of proteins and of esterases found in S. faecalis differed from those in S. faecium and S. durans. Strains of S. faecalis differing in serotype and variety showed a very similar series of proteins, some differences in patterns of esterases were found, but similar patterns occurred in strains differing in type and variety. The major protein bands of S. faecium and S. durans differed in mobility from the major proteins of S. faecalis; different strains of S. faecium and S. durans showed some differences in other protein bands. Esterase activity of S. faecium and S. durans was weaker than that of S. faecalis, and in the case of most strains only faint esterase bands were detected. A strain of S. faecium which gave protein and esterase patterns different from those of the remaining strains, differed also in showing motility.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Barbara M. Lund (1965) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a725accce524a4339c56585https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-40-3-413
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Genotype–phenotype correlation of fecal Streptococcus regulator (fsr) locus with gelatinase activity and biofilm formation intensity in clinical E. faecalis isolates2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Comparative proteomics analysis of biofilms and planktonic cells of Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus lugdunensis with contrasting biofilm-forming ability2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3Comparative enzyme studies of Escherichia Coli and other enteric bacteria1980
  4. 4SEDS glycosyltransferases in <i>E. faecalis</i> are upregulated by the CroS/R two-component system to enhance peptidoglycan synthesis during cell wall stress2025
  5. 5Comparative genomic characterization and antimicrobial resistance of bacteremia-causing <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> and <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> in a Chinese hospital2026