PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 20, 2010ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)149 citationsOpen Access

The national heart failure audit for England and Wales 2008–2009

JCJohn G.F. ClelandTMT. McDonaghARAlan S. Rigby

Key Result

Admission to general medicine rather than cardiology wards for heart failure was associated with higher in-patient mortality (adjusted HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.5-2.5; P<0.001).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=6,170)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does management on cardiology wards compared to general medicine wards improve survival and care quality in patients hospitalized with heart failure?

P
Population
6,170 patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of heart failure across 86 hospitals in England and Wales.
E
Exposure
Management on cardiology wards (specialist services)
C
Comparator
Management on general medicine wards
O
Outcome
Rates of investigations, treatments and specialist management, length of hospital stay, and mortality (in-patient and 1-year)hard clinical

Specialist cardiology care for hospitalized heart failure patients is associated with higher rates of guideline-directed medical therapy and significantly lower mortality compared to general medical care.

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 1.9 (95% CI 1.5–2.5)

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To obtain national data on the clinical characteristics, investigation, management and outcome of patients hospitalised with a diagnosis of heart failure. METHOD: A survey was carried out of the first 10 patients hospitalised with a primary diagnosis of heart failure each month in 86 hospitals providing services for acute medical admissions in England and Wales from April 2008 until March 2009. The main outcome measures were rates of investigations, treatments and specialist management, length of hospital stay and mortality. RESULTS: The 86 hospitals enrolled 6170 patients with a median age of 78 years (IQR 70-85 years), including 2639 (43%) women. At admission, only 30% of patients were breathless at rest, while 43% had peripheral oedema. Echocardiograms were recorded in 75% of patients and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was ≤40% in 78%. Natriuretic peptides were rarely measured. Allowing for missing data, >90% of patients were treated with loop diuretics at discharge, 80% with ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, 50% with β-blockers and 30% with aldosterone antagonists. Patients with an LVEF <40% were more likely to receive these agents. Median hospital stay was 9 days (IQR 5-17) and in-patient mortality was 12%. Patients admitted to general medicine rather than cardiology wards were more likely to die (HR=2.5, 95% CI 2.0 to 3.3, p<0.001) even after adjusting for differences (HR=1.9, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.5, p<0.001). Projected 1-year mortality below and above age 75 years was 26% and 56%, with higher rates if managed on general medicine rather than cardiology wards (HR=1.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.6, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The prognosis of patients hospitalised with heart failure remains poor and investigation and treatment suboptimal. Specialist services are associated with higher rates of investigation and treatment and improved outcome.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cleland et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=6,170). Admission to general medicine wards vs. Admission to cardiology wards was evaluated on In-patient mortality (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.5-2.5, p=<0.001). Admission to general medicine rather than cardiology wards for heart failure was associated with higher in-patient mortality (adjusted HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.5-2.5; P<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7c8dc1668c3162adc890f6https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2010.209171
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper