PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1996The American Journal of Surgical Pathology71 citations

Pleomorphic Soft Tissue Myogenic Sarcomas of Adulthood

View Full Paper
WSWalter SchürchHôpital Notre-DameLBLouis R. BéginHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalTSThomas A. SeemayerUniversity of Siena

Structured PICO

P
Population
325 diverse sarcomas from adults, including 39 rhabdomyosarcomas (RMS) (18 pleomorphic), 135 leiomyosarcomas (LMS) (14 pleomorphic), 24 pleomorphic malignant fibrous histiocytomas (MFH), and 8 pleomorphic liposarcomas (LS).
I
Intervention
Morphological (histology and ultrastructure) and immunohistochemical analysis (vimentin, desmin, alpha-smooth actin, alpha-sarcomeric actin)
O
Outcome
Cytoskeletal profile and ultrastructural features to distinguish pleomorphic sarcomassurrogate

Accurate diagnosis of adult pleomorphic sarcomas requires combined morphological and immunohistochemical analysis, as they are often indistinguishable by histologic growth pattern alone.

Abstract

325 diverse sarcomas, 39 rhabdomyosarcomas (RMS), including all histologic variants, and 135 leiomyosarcomas (LMS) were identified. Within these two groups, 18 (46%) of the RMS and 14 (10%) of the LMS represented pleomorphic variants. These neoplasms were studied by morphology (histology and ultrastructure) and by immunohistochemical methods employing antibodies to intermediate filaments (vimentin and desmin) and actin isoforms alpha-smooth (sm) and alpha-sarcomeric (sr) actins. Twenty-four pleomorphic malignant fibrous histiocytomas (MFH) and eight pleomorphic liposarcomas (LS) were examined in a similar fashion. By light microscopy, the pleomorphic RMS, LMS, and MFH were indistinguishable, as each was dominated by pleomorphic cells disposed in a haphazard growth pattern; moreover, many featured fascicular, storiform, and sclerotic zones. The distinction between these neoplasms became apparent only following immunohistochemistry and/or ultrastructural study. All pleomorphic RMS disclosed rudimentary sarcomeres and exhibited the following cytoskeletal profile: vimentin (+) (18 of 18), desmin (+) (14 of 18), alpha-sr actin (+) (18 of 18) and alpha-sm actin (+) (five of 18). All the pleomorphic LMS featured smooth-muscle differentiation of variable degrees in the form of cytoplasmic bundles of microfilaments and associated dense bodies; their cytoskeletal profile was vimentin (+) (14 of 14), desmin (+) (seven of 14), alpha-sr actin (+) (none of 14), and alpha-sm actin (+) (eight of 14). The latter was demonstrated in all moderately differentiated, but absent or only focally expressed in poorly differentiated variants. All pleomorphic MFH and LS were devoid of myogenic (skeletal or smooth) ultrastructural features and expressed vimentin solely. This combined morphological and immunohistochemical study illustrates the following: First, these pleomorphic sarcomas are often indistinguishable by histologic growth pattern alone; thus, an accurate diagnosis requires study with all of these techniques. Second, pleomorphic myogenic sarcomas are restricted to adults and are not uncommon neoplasms among pleomorphic sarcomas: RMS (28%), LMS (21%), MFH (38%), and LS (13%). Third, the study defines desmin-negative and alpha-sm actin-positive pleomorphic RMS, and desmin-negative and alpha-sm-actin-negative pleomorphic LMS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schürch et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7dea34f980e83641188182https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-199602000-00001
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper