PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 14, 2026European Heart Journal56 citations

Comparison of a rehabilitation programme, a counselling programme and usual care after an acute myocardial infarction: results of a long-term randomized trial

View Full Paper
ALA. LeizoroviezASA Saint-PierreCVC. Vasselon

Key Result

A 6-week rehabilitation programme significantly increased the percentage of post-MI patients reaching maximal heart rate at 2 years compared to usual care and counselling (50% vs 24% and 13%, P=0.001).

Key Points

  • To evaluate and compare the long-term clinical outcomes and exercise capacity of a 6-week exercise rehabilitation programme, a counselling programme, and usual care in patients recovering from acute myocardial infarction.
  • Randomized trial involving 182 male post-myocardial infarction patients under 65 years old assigned 30 to 60 days post-infarction to a 6-week rehabilitation programme (RP), counselling programme without exercise (CP), or usual care (UC).
  • Patients completed follow-up assessments and bicycle ergometer exercise tests at 2, 12, and 24 months post-randomization.
  • At 2 years, a significantly higher proportion of patients in the RP group reached maximal heart rate during exercise testing (RP: 50%, UC: 24%, CP: 13%; P = 0.001).
  • Two-year mortality was 0 deaths in RP, 4 in UC, and 5 in CP (P = 0.08 across groups; P = 0.03 for RP vs. combined UC and CP), while reinfarction rates were 7% in RP, 7% in CP, and 10% in UC.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=182)

Randomization

randomized

Structured PICO

Does a 6-week rehabilitation programme improve exercise capacity and reduce mortality or reinfarction in male post-myocardial infarction patients under 65 years old compared to counselling or usual care?

P
Population
182 male post-myocardial infarction patients under 65 years old, randomized to a rehabilitation programme, counselling, or usual care, and followed for 24 months.
I
Intervention
6-week rehabilitation programme (RP)
C
Comparator
Counselling programme without exercise training (CP) and usual care (UC)
O
Outcome
Maximal heart rate at exercise test, mortality, and reinfarction rates at 2 yearshard clinical

A 6-week exercise-based rehabilitation program significantly improves long-term exercise capacity and reduces mortality at 2 years in young male patients following an uncomplicated myocardial infarction.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 50% vs 24%

p-value: p=0.001

Abstract

One hundred and eighty-two male post myocardial infarction patients under 65 years old were randomized 30 to 60 days after the acute event into a 6-week rehabilitation programme (RP), a counselling programme without exercise training training (CP) and usual care (UC). Follow-up visits and exercise tests on a bicycle ergometer were performed 2, 12 and 24 months after randomization. Baseline characteristics were identical in the three groups. The percentage of patients reaching the maximal heart rate at exercise test was higher in the RP group even after 2 years (UC = 24%, CP = 13%, RP = 50%, P = 0.001). The number of deaths at 2 years was respectively 4, 5 and 0 in the UC, CP and RP groups (P = 0.08). If UC and CP groups are combined and tested against RP the difference is statistically significant (P = 0.03). Reinfarction rates were similar in the three groups (UC = 10%, CP = 7%, RP = 7%). This study confirms that a rehabilitation programme seems worth recommending in young patients with uncomplicated myocardial infarction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Leizoroviez et al. (1991) conducted an RCT in acute myocardial infarction (n=182). 6-week rehabilitation programme vs. counselling programme and usual care was evaluated on reaching the maximal heart rate at exercise test at 2 years (p=0.001). A 6-week rehabilitation programme significantly increased the percentage of post-MI patients reaching maximal heart rate at 2 years compared to usual care and counselling (50% vs 24% and 13%, P=0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7f86427e926889991bb38fhttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059948
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper