PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 2008Clinical Chemistry34 citationsOpen Access

Aspirin Responsiveness in Healthy Volunteers Measured with Multiple Assay Platforms

View Full Paper
BKBrad S. KaronAWAmy M. WockenfusRSRenee Scott

Structured PICO

Are light transmission aggregometry, PFA-100, VerifyNow, and urinary 11-dehydro-thromboxane B(2) sensitive and concordant in detecting aspirin responsiveness in healthy volunteers?

P
Population
29 healthy laboratory volunteers
I
Intervention
Aspirin 80 mg for 7 days (a subset took 325 mg for an additional 7 days)
C
Comparator
Baseline measurements (before aspirin)
O
Outcome
Aspirin responsiveness measured by light transmission aggregometry, PFA-100, VerifyNow, and urinary 11-dehydro-thromboxane B(2)surrogate

Light transmission aggregometry, PFA-100, VerifyNow, and urinary 11-dehydro-thromboxane B(2) are all sensitive and highly concordant in detecting aspirin effects in healthy individuals.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the sensitivity, precision, and concordance of 4 assays designed to detect aspirin responsiveness or resistance. METHODS: Twenty-nine healthy laboratory volunteers took 80 mg aspirin for 7 days, and a subset of volunteers took 325 mg aspirin for an additional 7 days. We measured platelet function by light transmission aggregometry with arachidonic acid, PFA-100, and VerifyNow. PFA-100 and VerifyNow assays were performed in duplicate to assess method imprecision. Some volunteers had samples taken within 2-4 h of the final dose of aspirin and again within 20-24 h of the final dose. We measured urinary 11-dehydro-thromboxane B(2) at baseline and after 80 or 325 mg aspirin. RESULTS: No volunteers were nonresponsive to aspirin therapy as measured by the PFA-100. One of 29 participants demonstrated lack of response to aspirin as measured by VerifyNow and urinary 11-dehydro-thromboxane B(2); 2 of 29 demonstrated lack of response as measured by light transmission aggregometry. Imprecision was 90%) between all assays. Neither aspirin dose (80 vs 325 mg) nor timing between final dose of aspirin and blood draw (2-4 vs 20-24 h) affected any of the assays. CONCLUSIONS: Light transmission aggregometry, PFA-100, VerifyNow, and urinary 11-dehydro-thromboxane B(2) are all sensitive to the effects of aspirin in healthy individuals. Variables such as aspirin dose, timing between final dose of aspirin and blood collection, and imprecision do not affect the ability of the assays to detect aspirin effect on platelet function.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Karon et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a80a9819fb6070370caf28ehttps://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2007.101014
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparison of four laboratory methods to assess aspirin sensitivity2008 · 24 citations
  2. 2Response to aspirin in healthy individuals2009 · 71 citations
  3. 3Lack of reproducibility of assessment of aspirin responsiveness by optical aggregometry and two platelet function tests2008 · 68 citations
  4. 4A comparison of platelet function tests and thromboxane metabolites to evaluate aspirin response in healthy individuals and patients with coronary artery disease2010 · 135 citations
  5. 5Determination of Aspirin Responsiveness by Use of Whole Blood Platelet Aggregometry2007 · 67 citations