PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1993AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology83 citations

Differences in EDNO contribution to arteriolar diameters at rest and during functional dilation in striated muscle

View Full Paper
RHRobert L. HesterCross-Cutting CardiologyAEA. EraslanIstanbul UniversityYSYoshiaki SaitoFood and Drug Safety Center

Structured PICO

Does EDNO inhibition alter arteriolar diameter at rest and during functional dilation in striated muscle?

P
Population
Hamster cremaster muscle (first-, second-, and third-order arterioles)
I
Intervention
Intravenous N omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) for EDNO inhibition
C
Comparator
Baseline measurements before EDNO inhibition
O
Outcome
Arteriolar diameter at rest and during 1 min of field stimulationsurrogate

EDNO contributes significantly to resting tone and functional dilation in larger (first- and second-order) arterioles, but not in smaller (third-order) arterioles in striated muscle.

Abstract

This study was designed to determine the physiological role of endothelium-dependent nitric oxide (EDNO) in the control of arteriolar diameter during rest and muscle stimulation. Diameters of first-, second-, and third-order arterioles in the superfused hamster cremaster muscle were measured before and throughout 1 min of field stimulation before and after inhibition of EDNO release. ENDO inhibition by intravenous N omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) significantly attenuated the arteriolar vasodilation in response to 1 microM acetylcholine. First-order arterioles averaged 65 +/- 5 microns at rest and dilated to 86 +/- 6 microns during muscle stimulation (n = 9), second-order arterioles averaged 45 +/- 6 microns and dilated to 72 +/- 3 microns during muscle stimulation (n = 6), with third-order arterioles averaging 29 +/- 2 microns, and dilating to 53 +/- 3 microns during muscle stimulation (n = 7). EDNO inhibition significantly decreased both the resting diameter of first-order arterioles (57 +/- 4 microns) and functional dilation (68 +/- 3 microns; P < 0.05). EDNO inhibition had no effect on the resting diameter of second-order arterioles (45 +/- 5 microns) yet significantly attenuated the functional dilation (64 +/- 4 microns; P < 0.05). EDNO inhibition had no effect on either the resting diameter of third-order arterioles (30 +/- 2 microns) or the functional dilation (49 +/- 2 microns).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hester et al. (1993) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a83f7ceff78c9927a9981e5https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1993.265.1.h146
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper