PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2001Heart62 citationsOpen Access

Response of the QT interval to mental and physical stress in types LQT1 and LQT2 of the long QT syndrome

KPKristian Paavonen

Structured PICO

Does mental and physical stress affect the QT interval differently in patients with LQT1 and LQT2 compared to healthy controls?

P
Population
44 subjects: 16 asymptomatic patients with type 1 long QT syndrome (LQT1), 14 asymptomatic patients with type 2 long QT syndrome (LQT2), and 14 healthy control subjects.
I
Intervention
Three types of mental stress tests and a submaximal exercise stress test.
C
Comparator
Healthy control subjects.
O
Outcome
QT intervals measured from lead V3.surrogate

QT adaptation to physical stress is blunted in asymptomatic LQT1 and LQT2 patients compared to healthy controls, whereas adaptation to mental stress is similar across groups.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study and compare the effects of mental and physical stress on long QT syndrome (LQTS) patients. DESIGN: Case-control study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: QT intervals were measured from lead V3. Serum potassium and plasma catecholamine concentrations were also monitored. PATIENTS: 16 patients with type 1 LQTS (LQT1), 14 with type 2 LQTS (LQT2), both groups asymptomatic, and 14 healthy control subjects. INTERVENTIONS: Three types of mental stress tests and a submaximal exercise stress test. RESULTS: Heart rate responses to mental stress and exercise were similar in all groups. During mental stress, the mean QT interval shortened to a similar extent in controls (-29 ms), LQT1 patients (-34 ms), and LQT2 patients (-30 ms). During exercise, the corresponding QT adaptation to exercise stress was more pronounced (p < 0.01) in healthy controls (-47 ms) than in LQT1 (-38 ms) or LQT2 patients (-38 ms). During exercise changes in serum potassium concentrations were correlated to changes in QT intervals in controls, but not in LQTS patients. LQT1 and LQT2 patients did not differ in serum potassium, catecholamine or heart rate responses to mental or physical stress. CONCLUSIONS: QT adaptation to mental and exercise stress in healthy people and in patients with LQTS is different. In healthy people QT adaptation is more sensitive to physical than to mental stress while no such diverging pattern was seen in asymptomatic LQTS patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kristian Paavonen (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a859ae7c77636c4365e16dahttps://doi.org/10.1136/heart.86.1.39
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Type 1 long QT syndrome and psychological stress in a laboratory setting2018 · 4 citations
  2. 2Ventricular Repolarization and Heart Rate Responses During Cardiovascular Autonomic Function Testing in LQT1 Subtype of Long QT Syndrome2006 · 15 citations
  3. 3Genotype- and Mutation Site–Specific QT Adaptation During Exercise, Recovery, and Postural Changes in Children With Long-QT Syndrome2011 · 73 citations
  4. 4Mental stress test: a rapid, simple, and efficient test to unmask long QT syndrome2018 · 19 citations
  5. 5Do LQTS Gene Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Alter QTc Intervals at Rest and during Exercise Stress Testing?2013 · 8 citations