PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2018Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care19 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of inter-arm difference in blood pressure as predictor of vascular diseases among urban adults in Kancheepuram District of Tamil Nadu

SGS. GopalakrishnanSRM Institute of Science and TechnologyASA. K. SavithaSree Balaji Dental College and HospitalRRR RamaSri Sai University

Structured PICO

P
Population
1,634 urban adults in Kancheepuram district, Tamil Nadu
I
Intervention
Measurement of inter-arm difference (IAD) in blood pressure
O
Outcome
Prevalence of inter-arm difference (IAD) in blood pressure and its association with risk factorssurrogate

A high prevalence of inter-arm blood pressure difference was observed among urban adults, which significantly correlated with vascular risk factors like hypertension, smoking, and obesity.

Abstract

Introduction: An “Inter-Arm Difference” (IAD) in blood pressure (BP) is defined as a variation in systolic BP of >10 mmHg. Various studies conducted in different population show that there are wide variations in the prevalence of IAD, which ranges from 5% to 46%. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of IAD in BP among adults and its association with risk factors. Methods: This community-based cross-sectional study was carried out among urban adults in Kancheepuram district. The study sample size of 1634 was calculated, and simple random sampling method was used. Data analysis was performed using SPSS software version 16. Prevalence of IAD in BP was calculated using percentages, and statistical significance was tested to look for an association. Results: This study shows that 26.2% were at moderate risk for vascular events with IAD in systolic BP of 10–15 mmHg and 17.3% were at high risk with IAD >15 mmHg. About 14.2% had diastolic BP difference of 10–15 mmHg indicative of moderate risk and 6.1% had a difference of >15 mmHg indicative of high risk for vascular events. The statistical significant association was found between IAD in systolic BP and risk factors such as hypertension, smoking, alcoholism, and between IAD in diastolic BP with overweight/obesity (P < 0.05). Conclusion: This study outcome shows that the prevalence of IAD in BP is on the higher side. Hence, specific guidelines should be brought in to practice for measuring BP in both arms to detect IAD in every health-care settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gopalakrishnan et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a87ba378111c1e98f48f369https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_62_17
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Interarm Difference in Blood Pressure, an Unspoken Necessity: A Comparative Study Among Normotensive and Age-Matched Hypertensive Individuals in a Tertiary Care Centre in South India2026
  2. 2The inter-arm blood pressure difference and peripheral vascular disease: cross-sectional study2007 · 76 citations
  3. 3Relationship between inter-arm blood pressure differences and predicted future cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients2024
  4. 4Inter-arm blood pressure difference, when is it a useful risk marker for cardiovascular events?2021 · 3 citations
  5. 5Association of interarm blood pressure difference with cardio‐cerebral vascular disease: A community‐based, cross‐sectional study2019 · 11 citations