PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1997The American Journal of Medicine47 citationsOpen Access

The Secondary Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease

View Full Paper
ARAlan RozanskiCardiac ImagingJFJames S. ForresterInterventional Cardiology

Structured PICO

Does medical secondary prevention improve outcomes and angiographic progression in patients with coronary artery disease?

P
Population
Patients with established coronary artery disease
I
Intervention
Medical secondary prevention programs including exercise, diet, lipid modification, and smoking cessation
O
Outcome
Angiographic progression/regression, symptoms, quality of life, and cardiovascular risk reduction

Medical secondary prevention programs are highly effective in stabilizing or regressing coronary artery disease and improving quality of life, supporting widespread implementation.

Abstract

Randomized clinical trials demonstrate the efficacy of medical secondary prevention in coronary disease patients. The magnitude of risk reduction with exercise, diet, lipid modification, and smoking cessation is similar to other medical therapies for coronary disease such as aspirin, beta blockers, as well as coronary bypass surgery, (Table VI) In contrast to these therapies, however, secondary prevention stabilizes angiographic progression in about 50% of patients and induces regression in about 25% of patients. Both symptoms and perceived quality of life also are beneficially altered by secondary prevention programs, although possibly not by the magnitude reported for bypass surgery. These clinical trial results have led the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology to strongly endorse secondary prevention. A reasonable projection based on these clinical trial data is that widespread use of these recommendations in the 12 million established coronary disease patients would significantly reduce coronary mortality and morbidity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rozanski et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a87c4a1c0493623866c7f77https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9343(97)00046-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper