PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 6, 2013Transboundary and Emerging Diseases51 citations

Financial Impact of Foot and Mouth Disease on Large Ruminant Smallholder Farmers in the Greater Mekong Subregion

View Full Paper
SNS. NampanyaSKSyseng KhounsyAPAloun Phonvisay

Key Result

Foot and mouth disease outbreaks caused significant financial losses for smallholder farmers in northern Laos, varying from USD 381 to USD 1124 per household across provinces (P<0.001).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=310)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

P
Population
310 large ruminant smallholder farmers in northern Laos interviewed to determine financial losses from foot and mouth disease outbreaks.
O
Outcome
Financial losses, including direct losses due to mortality and morbidity, and indirect losses due to costs of treatments.

Foot and mouth disease outbreaks cause severe financial losses for smallholder farmers in Laos, highlighting the need for comprehensive health and biosecurity interventions beyond just vaccination.

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

A retrospective investigation of financial losses incurred by large ruminant smallholder farmers due to outbreaks of foot and mouth disease (FMD) in 2010-12 in northern Laos was conducted in 2012. The aim was to support recommendations on sustainable transboundary animal disease control strategies in the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS). Large ruminant smallholders in the three northern provinces of Luang Prabang (LPB), Xiengkhoung (XK) and Xayyabouli (XYL) were interviewed (n = 310). Financial losses were determined, including direct losses due to mortality (100% of pre-FMD sale value) and morbidity (difference between the expected sale price pre-FMD and 1 month following onset of FMD), and indirect losses due to costs of treatments. The losses due to FMD per household varied between provinces (P < 0.001) and were USD 1124, USD 862 and USD 381 in LPB, XK and XYL, respectively, being 60, 40 and 16% of annual household income. Comparison of the costs of FMD with annual household income from sales of large ruminants indicated losses of 213, 181 and 60% of the income in LPB, XK and XYL, respectively. The variation in losses between provinces was due to differences in levels of morbidity with highest in LPB, treatment methods with antibiotic use common in LPB, age of animals sold and sale prices with higher prices in XK. Partial budget analysis of biannual FMD vaccination indicated an average net benefit of USD 22 and USD 33 for cattle and buffalo, respectively. However, vaccination alone is unlikely to control FMD in the region. Promotion of multiple large ruminant health and production intervention programmes to stimulate interest in biosecurity in addition to vaccination is recommended, providing a more sustainable pathway for poverty reduction through the current expansion of livestock investments in the GMS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nampanya et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Foot and mouth disease (n=310). Foot and mouth disease outbreaks was evaluated on Financial losses per household (p=<0.001). Foot and mouth disease outbreaks caused significant financial losses for smallholder farmers in northern Laos, varying from USD 381 to USD 1124 per household across provinces (P<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a89a5e6f8670bac6e335059https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12183
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper