PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 5, 1998Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)27 citations

Evaluation of the Activated Partial Thrombo-plastin Time (APTT) Sensitivity to Heparin Using Five Commercial Reagents: Implications for Therapeutic Monitoring

View Full Paper
FMFranco ManzatoAMAlessandra MengoniAGAngela Grilenzoni

Structured PICO

How do different commercial reagents affect the sensitivity of APTT measurements to heparin?

P
Population
19 ex vivo heparinized samples
I
Intervention
APTT measurement using five commercial reagents
C
Comparator
Comparison among the five reagents and against plasma heparin concentrations
O
Outcome
Sensitivity to heparin (correlation coefficients and slopes of linear regressions)surrogate

Significant reagent-dependent differences exist in APTT sensitivity to heparin, emphasizing the need for standardized reference materials and methods for therapeutic monitoring.

Abstract

Heparin is an effective drug for prevention and treatment of thromboembolic conditions. Although several biological assays have been proposed for monitoring unfractionated heparin therapy, the measurement of the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) is the most widely employed test, and the overall risk of thromboembolic episodes was markedly reduced by maintaining APTT ratios above 1.5. However, the adjustment of the heparin therapy on the basis of APTT presents several questions which are still unresolved. Major discrepancies were found in APTTs performed using different reagents in both ex vivo and in vitro heparinized samples and occasionally with different lots of the same reagents; poor correlation was observed between APTT values and plasma heparin concentrations. In order to gain further insights into this phenomenon, we analysed the sensitivity to heparin of five commercial reagents for APTT measurement in 19 ex vivo heparinized samples. Differences were observed; correlation coefficients ranged from 0.820 to 0.985 and slopes of linear regressions from 0.26 to 1.14. Moreover, unsatisfactory correlations were obtained when APTT ratios were compared with heparin plasma concentrations in the same patients' samples. In the heparin therapeutic range of 0.35 - 0.70 U/ml, reagent-dependent differences were observed in the corresponding APTT values. These results point out a critical role of the assay methodology in monitoring heparin therapy by APTT. We suggest that reference materials and methods should be urgently identified, a universally agreed scale for reporting results should be established and reference ranges for the unfractionated heparin therapy should be reconsidered taking on account the reagent employed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Manzato et al. (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a92663226deb1804941d6aahttps://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.1998.168
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper