Abstract Fixel-based analysis (FBA) has gained substantial interest for its ability to probe fibre-specific changes in the brain’s white matter from diffusion-weighted imaging data. However, the reproducibility and reliability of fixel-based measures across different scanners remains largely unknown. In this work, we present TRAMFIX: a multisite dataset of travelling participants (n=10 healthy adults) scanned across four 3T MRI scanners using a harmonised multi-shell DWI protocol. DWI data were processed using two pipelines that can adopted when performing multi-site FBA studies (site-specific versus pooled processing). We extracted fixel-based measures of fibre density (FD), fibre cross-section (FC), and fibre density and cross-section (FDC), as well as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) from the harmonised protocol. Within-subject coefficients of variation (CV ws ) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of FBA and DTI measures were computed at multiple resolutions of computation and analysis: (i) the whole-brain averaged level, (ii) tract-level, and (iii) fixel- or voxel-level. Fixel-based metrics demonstrated high reproducibility and reliability at the whole-brain level (CV ws ranging between 0.51% to 1.57% and ICC between 0.93 and 0.996). While reproducibility and reliability remained high for tract-averaged FBA measures (particularly the FC and FDC metrics), some tracts exhibited lower ICC values < 0.8 for the FD measure. When examining fixel-level reliability and reproducibility clear spatial patterns emerged, with lower ICC across subcortical and cerebellar regions, and higher CV ws at the cortical boundaries. Across all levels, tensor-based metrics demonstrated slightly lower reproducibility and reliability metrics than FBA measures, suggesting that FBA metrics are just as, if not more, reproducible than DTI metrics across scanners when using identical protocols. Our findings provide support for the reproducibility and reliability of fixel-based measures, highlighting their potential for use in multi-site FBA studies. Future work examining protocol-related differences, as well as appropriate harmonisation strategies when pooling data across sites and scanners, will be valuable.
Mito et al. (Fri,) studied this question.