PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 15, 2025Environmental Research Communications2 citationsOpen Access

Development of Integrated Machine Learning Model for Estimation of Spatial Distribution of Particulate Matter Pollutant in Air

View Full Paper
AKAlex Mwololo KimuyaDMDaniel MaitethiaDKDickson Mwenda Kinyua

Key Points

  • Machine learning models accurately estimate PM concentration in the air, improving pollution mapping capabilities.
  • The ANN achieved over 86% accuracy for PM concentrations, using both weather and feature data to enhance predictions.
  • Analysis utilized a spatiotemporal dataset from sensor nodes over a month, assessing performance at three different sites.
  • Results suggest integrating weather parameters can significantly boost model accuracy, underscoring the advantages of feature engineering.

Abstract

Abstract Accurate estimation of particulate matter (PM) concentration in air is crucial for understanding and mitigating air pollution. Conventional PM measurement systems often provide only single-point, instantaneous readings, limiting their ability to create comprehensive spatial pollution maps. This study aims to address this limitation by leveraging Machine Learning (ML) techniques to predict PM concentration using data from a limited number of sensor nodes. ML training spatiotemporal dataset was collected over a month, encompassing PM1.0, PM2.5, and PM10 concentrations, weather parameters, and spatial information. Four machine learning models namely; LSTM, ANN, SVR, and Random Forest, were evaluated for their ability to predict the spatial distribution of PM concentration at three different sites. The analysis revealed that ANNs consistently outperformed other models across different feature combinations. Within a 160‑meter radius of a central sensor node at (First Site), the ANN model achieved an average prediction accuracy above 86.0% for PM concentrations, with RMSE and MAE values of 1.72 µg/m³ and 0.80 µg/m³, respectively. The inclusion of weather parameters and feature engineering improved model performance by 12% to 18%, compared to models using only geometric features. When applied to (Second Site), the ANN model maintained an accuracy of 85%, demonstrating strong intra‑environment generalizability. However, performance declined at the (Third Site), located 3 kilometers away in a peri‑urban market setting, where microclimatic and topographic variability resulted in a lower prediction accuracy of 59.2%. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of a machine learning-based approach to overcome the limitations of single-point PM sensors and predict PM concentration across a region. The results highlight the superior performance of ANNs and emphasize the importance of incorporating weather parameters and feature engineering in model training. These findings are promising and point to a new approach of developing a practical model for spatial estimation of PM distribution from measurements obtained from sensor networks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kimuya et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68a366930a429f797332c129https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/adfb46
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's next2022 · 83 citations
  2. 2Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part I): Data-driven Solutions of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations2017 · 977 citations
  3. 3Ensemble learning models for the prediction of the weekly peak of PM2.5 concentration in Algiers, Algeria2023 · 2 citations
  4. 4Real-time air quality forecasting, part I: History, techniques, and current status2012 · 521 citations
  5. 5Version specific test case prioritization approach based on artificial neural network2019 · 26 citations