PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 14, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Contrasts and similarities in the transcriptomic response to antimicrobial coinage metals in Escherichia coli

View Full Paper
DSDaniel A. Salazar-AlemánAMA. J. McGibbonRTRaymond J. Turner

Key Points

  • The study reveals significant differences in how E. coli responds to antimicrobial metals like silver and copper, highlighting unique adaptive mechanisms.
  • After 10 hours of exposure, gene expression changes were seen in essential metal uptake and stress response pathways in E. coli under metal stress.
  • Using RNA-seq profiling, the research presents a detailed look at the bactericidal mechanisms and stress responses to coinage metals in E. coli.
  • This understanding of bacterial responses to metal-based antimicrobials may inform better strategies for tackling antibiotic-resistant infections.

Abstract

ABSTRACT With the rise of resistance to last resort antibiotics, metal-based antimicrobials have re-emerged as an alternative to prevent and manage infections. The group 11 metals (copper, silver, gold), historically known for their usage in coins and similar chemical properties, have demonstrated promising bactericidal activity. Despite their efficiency, we do not have a complete understanding for how bacteria are eradicated by metal ions and how they respond to metal-induced stress. One understudied aspect of these metal-bacteria interactions are prolonged exposure models, as other studies tend to focus on the acute toxic response of antimicrobial metals. We used RNA-seq profiling to understand the Escherichia coli physiological response to sublethal inhibitory antimicrobial coinage metal stress after 10 hours of incubation. Gene expression patterns of the adaptive and intrinsic response elicited by each metal were identified, including increased essential metal uptake (Ag, Cu, Au), cysteine biosynthesis (Cu, Au), change of the metal ion oxidation state (Cu, Au), efflux of metal stressor (Cu), protein translation and ribosome biogenesis (Au), and cell envelope stress response (Ag). In this paper, we highlight the remarkable differences and similarities in the transcriptomic response profile of E. coli to these antimicrobial metal elements. IMPORTANCE Dogma has existed that all antimicrobial metals kill bacteria the same way, leading to the assumption that bacteria respond the same way to metal toxicity. Nowadays, we have a better understanding why some metal elements are more toxic than others, but questions remain in relation to how bacteria adapt to survive and thrive when challenged by different metal-based antimicrobials. Our study advances the field by characterizing the type of bacterial response(s) to acclimate and grow during a prolonged exposure of silver, copper and gold – metallic elements that are known for their antimicrobial activity. Taking advantage of well-characterized Escherichia coli , we propose a model that summarizes our findings after comparing the shared and unique responses to each of these metals. This information enhances our understanding of bacterial tolerance to metal-based antimicrobials, which can lead to improved drug development strategies as society continues to search for alternatives against antibiotic-resistant pathogens.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Salazar-Alemán et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af55d8ad7bf08b1eadc961https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.12.669831
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper