Background: The article offers a close posthumanist reading of Kazuo Ishiguro’s novel Never Let Me Go in the context of recent philosophical discourses that challenge traditional humanism. In an era marked by rapid biotechnological advancements and a growing interest in the status of the non-human, Ishiguro’s subtle dystopia provides fertile ground for reflection on the ontological and ethical boundaries of the human condition. The novel’s emotionally rich narrative opens up a symbolic space in which the very notion of what it means to be human is tested and destabilized. Purpose: The main aim of the article is to explore Never Let Me Go as a complex literary articulation of posthumanist thought. It sets out to identify the different strands of posthumanist theory (transhumanism, metahumanism, critical posthumanism, philosophical posthumanism), analyze their representation and limitations in the narrative, and argue that Ishiguro resists rigid classifications by constructing a polyphonic ethical world. The research seeks to reveal the novel’s potential to problematize anthropocentric paradigms and provoke critical reflection on the ethics of exclusion, reproduction, and death. Methods: The research employs an interdisciplinary theoretical framework combining posthumanist philosophy and literary criticism. Through close reading of key scenes and symbols in Ishiguro’s novel, the article engages with the ideas of theorists such as F. Ferrando, N. Bostrom, S. Herbrechter, P. Nayar, and J. Garreau. The analysis pays attention to narrative structure, symbolic dichotomies, emotional registers, and metaphorical representations of “the Other.” Results: The article identifies multiple posthumanist layers within the novel: the symbolic construction of clone bodies, the emotional realism of non-humans, the internalized exclusion, and the haunting tension between identity and function. While no explicit technological revolution takes place in the narrative, the very premise of clones as donors exposes the ethical bankruptcy of a society that instrumentalizes life. Ishiguro does not provide answers but rather immerses the reader in a deeply affective ethical dilemma. Discussion: The findings suggest that Never Let Me Go should be considered not as a classic dystopia, but as a quiet, melancholic philosophical allegory that subtly dismantles humanist assumptions. The novel participates in the broader posthumanist critique of anthropocentrism, yet does so without rejecting the human subject altogether. It presents a new mode of ethical engagement—one that confronts the limits of compassion and recognition. Future research should continue exploring such emotionally resonant posthumanist narratives to map the evolving landscape of literature beyond the human.
А. Кутовий (Fri,) studied this question.