The implementation of the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in the State of Uttarakhand has sparked a controversy in recent times, not only because of the dissent it has been facing from various organizations and individuals challenging its constitutional validity but also due to the addition of Part III under the code, which seeks to regulate the live-in relationships. The state government's intent seems clear about safeguarding the interest of the women and children born out of such relationships. However, a plain reading of the Code and Rules regarding live-in relationships infers that instead of helping couples, the vaguely drafted code and rules may worsen the circumstances for couples. Moreover, such regulation also raises the question of whether the Code was enacted for the benefit of such couples or just a modern way of state policing. This article seeks to highlight the problematic provisions and underscore the need for a more couple-centric and balanced approach that ensures the safety and well-being of such couples in society.
Dimri et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: