This study aimed to develop and test the feasibility of a diagnostic instrument for assessing students' critical thinking skills on socio-scientific issues (SSI) in physics education with the topic of global warming. This objective is motivated by the lack of valid, reliable, and contextually appropriate assessment instruments based on Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI) in physics education at the secondary school level, amid the low critical thinking competencies of Indonesian students as indicated by the 2018 PISA survey, and the need for an SSI approach as an effective strategy. The research method employs a research and development (R ZSTD:–1.51 to 1.81; and PTMEA Corr: 0.26–0.68). The instrument's reliability is high, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.81, person reliability of 0.80, and item reliability of 0.91, using a structurally valid rating scale. However, significant DIF based on gender and region was found, indicating the need for further revision to ensure measurement fairness. This instrument is deemed valid and reliable for use as a diagnostic tool for critical thinking skills in SSI-based physics learning.
Wulandari et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: