PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 16, 2025Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice0 citationsOpen Access

Human factor in the use of automated insulin delivery systems: Real-world effects in children with type 1 diabetes after 2 years of use (AID-A study)

View Full Paper
JHJulia HoppmannSSSimone von SengbuschDSD. Schmidt

Key Points

  • HbA1c decreased from 8.1% to 7.6% after two years of AID usage, indicating improved glycaemic control.
  • Time in range increased significantly, showing enhanced glucose management among children with type 1 diabetes.
  • Participants reported noticeable improvements in daily life aspects, including stress and fear of hypoglycaemia.
  • BMI-SDS scores increased initially, suggesting potential weight management considerations in AID therapy.

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the metabolic effects, changes in daily life, and diabetes burden associated with automated insulin delivery (AID) systems in children in a real-world setting after 2 years of use. Longitudinal glycaemic data (glycated haemoglobin HbA1c, time in range TiR, time below range TbR, glucose management indicator GMI), body mass index (BMI), and AID system usage were collected from 111 children with type 1 diabetes at 12 and 24 months of AID use. After 1 year, adolescents and parents completed questionnaires on diabetes-related distress (P-PAID-C, P-PAID-T, and PAID-T) and experienced changes. Regardless of age or previous therapy, the HbA1c level decreased from 8.1 % (65 mmol/mol) to 7.7 % (61 mmol/mol), TiR increased from 55 % to 64 %, TbR decreased from 2.6 % to 1.8 %, and GMI (7.6 % vs. 7.3 %) improved after 1 year. After 2 years, HbA1c (7.6 % 60 mmol/mol), TiR (62 %), TbR (1.3 %), and GMI (7.4 %) levels stabilised. Adolescents and parents reported improvements in daily life (i.e. sleep, stress, fear of hypoglycaemia). However, the BMI-SDS scores increased in the first year. AID system use is associated with clinically relevant improvements in glycaemic control and decrease in daily diabetes-related burden on affected children and their parents.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hoppmann et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c93fe601120bef803bada1https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112477
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper