PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 16, 2025Religions0 citationsOpen Access

Composite Female Figurines and the Religion of Place: Figurines as Evidence of Commonality or Singularity in Iron IIB-C Southern Levantine Religion?

View Full Paper
EDErin Darby

Key Points

  • The paper investigates how female terracotta figurines illustrate variances in Levantine religion's practices and beliefs, revealing unique local traditions.
  • Analysis focuses on the dissemination of these figurines across Levantine states during Iron IIB-C, highlighting commonalities and regional distinctions.
  • The approach centers on how archaeological data provides insight into whether figurine designs reflect widespread religious practices or localized traditions.
  • Findings may shift perspectives in current scholarship on goddess-worship, opening paths to a deeper understanding of religion in various Levantine regions.

Abstract

Much attention has been paid to female, pillar-based figurines from Iron II Judah, and the veneration of a major goddess in that territory. Similarly, female figurines throughout the Levant have largely been treated as evidence of goddess-worship, writ large. While the focus on goddesses and fertility has been critiqued by contemporary scholarship, the prevalence of female terracotta figurines remains a productive ground for critical inquiry. There is still no consensus explaining the dissemination of female figurines throughout Levantine states during the Iron IIB-C and how to interpret the similarities and differences among these corpora. Do the similarities that distinguish the Levantine figurines from those of other regions indicate a widespread diffusion of similar praxis across Levantine religion? Do the unique features of figurine design, technology, and deposition that demarcate the corpora of one Levantine state from another provide evidence for a “religion of place” on a more local scale? How should scholars approach iconographic similarities when interpreting the use and function of figurines in different locales? In an attempt to address these questions, this paper uses Levantine composite female terracotta figurines as a test case to explore the way archaeological data both support and impede a geographically contextualized approach to religious praxis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Erin Darby (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4508931b076d99fa585cchttps://doi.org/10.3390/rel16091181
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Female terracotta figurines in orans posture as a Phenomenon of “Popular Religion” in Late Antique Egypt2026
  2. 2TERRACOTTA FIGURINES AND RITUAL OBJECTS FROM EARLY HISTORIC ODISHA: A CASE STUDY OF SOUTH ODISHA SITES2026
  3. 3An Iron Age II ceramic figurine from Umm Sweiwineh, Central Jordan2024
  4. 4Evaluations on an anthropomorphic vessel from İstanbul Archaeology Museums: The discussion of the ring-shaped idol or pendant and the mother goddess symbolism2025 · 2 citations
  5. 5A Brief Retrospective on the Evolution of Conceptions Regarding the Meaning and Interpretation of Palaeolithic Anthropomorphic Figurines2024