PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 17, 2025The European Physical Journal C2 citationsOpen Access

Constraints on superheavy dark matter decaying into h, Z and W

View Full Paper
ODOlivier Deligny

Key Points

  • Life expectancy of superheavy dark matter must exceed 10^22 years to be viable in cosmic settings.
  • Severe constraints arise from limiting gammas and neutrino emissions to acceptable flux levels—particularly in the galaxy.
  • Employing a theoretical framework, we demonstrate clear bounds connecting decay lifetime to mass-mixing parameters.
  • Discussion includes implications of these findings on broader inflationary cosmologies and particle-physics models.

Abstract

Abstract Dark matter particles could be superheavy (mass MX 10⁹~ M X ≳ 10 9 GeV) provided that their lifetime X τ X is extremely long, i. e. greater than 10^22~ ≃ 10 22 yr. Such stringent constraints on X τ X are generally obtained by limiting the prompt emission of ultrahigh energy (10⁹~ ≳ 10 9 GeV) gamma rays and neutrinos from the decay processes to below the corresponding flux upper bounds. In this paper, we show that even more severe bounds can be obtained for MX 10^13~ M X ≳ 10 13 GeV from the synchrotron radiation of electron decay byproducts in the Galaxy. We illustrate the power of these constraints using generic Higgs-induced h h ν and gauge-induced Z /W Z ν / W ℓ decay channels, motivated by particle-physics setups invoking right-handed neutrinos. As a concrete benchmark, we consider a superheavy dark-matter candidate within an extended type-I seesaw framework and show that the lower bounds on lifetime can be translated into upper bounds on a mass-mixing parameter M δ M, which must satisfy approximately M 2 10^-17/MX/ (10⁹~GeV) ^0. 5 δ M ≲ 2 × 10 - 17 / M X / (10 9 GeV) 0. 5 GeV for MX 10⁹ M X ≳ 10 9 GeV. Some implications in the context of inflationary cosmologies are discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Olivier Deligny (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d45e6a31b076d99fa5f1e5https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14736-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Hubble tension and cosmological imprints of $$U(1)_X$$ gauge symmetry: $$U(1)_{B_3-3 L_i}$$ as a case study2024 · 5 citations
  2. 2Dark matter-electron scattering and freeze-in scenarios in the light of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> mediation2024 · 6 citations
  3. 3Constraining neutrino-DM interactions with Milky Way dwarf spheroidals and supernova neutrinos2024 · 6 citations
  4. 4Primordial black holes and scalar-induced gravitational waves in radiative hybrid inflation2024 · 15 citations
  5. 5Probing dirac neutrino properties with dilepton signature2024