Objectives: Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) is widely used in orthodontics to correct transverse maxillary deficiencies. Beyond its skeletal and dental effects, RME may influence upper airway dimensions and respiratory function, particularly in growing individuals. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of RME on pulmonary function in adolescents using spirometric measurements. Materials and Methods: Fifteen adolescent patients (8 females, 7 males; mean age: 13.93 ± 2.89 years) diagnosed with maxillary transverse constriction underwent orthodontic treatment with acrylic-bonded RME appliances over a mean duration of 3.56 ± 0.67 months. Respiratory function was assessed via spirometry at baseline (T0) and one day after appliance removal (T1). Parameters recorded included peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC ratio, and vital capacity (VC). Data were analyzed using the paired-samples t-test (for normally distributed variables) or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (for non-normal distributions), with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Following RME treatment, all respiratory parameters showed a consistent upward trend but did not reach statistical significance. SpO2 increased from 96.98 ± 0.96% to 97.01 ± 0.98% (p = 0.925). VC rose from 2.86 ± 1.07 L to 3.03 ± 0.80 L (p = 0.626). The FEV1/FVC ratio improved from 90.88 ± 12.17% to 92.34 ± 7.37% (p = 0.742). Mean FEV1 increased from 2.61 ± 0.72 L to 2.72 ± 0.68 L (p = 0.518), while FVC rose from 2.87 ± 0.75 L to 2.96 ± 0.69 L (p = 0.547). No adverse effects were reported during the treatment period. Conclusions: This study identified a non-significant but consistent trend toward improved pulmonary function following RME in adolescents. These preliminary findings should be considered hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory evidence, as none of the outcomes reached statistical significance. While the observed upward trends in oxygen saturation, lung volumes, and expiratory performance suggest potential respiratory benefits, larger-scale, controlled, and long-term studies incorporating both spirometric and anatomical airway assessments are needed to validate these observations.
Akbulut et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: