PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 23, 20251 citationsOpen Access

RealBench: Benchmarking Verilog Generation Models with Real-World IP Designs

View Full Paper
PJPengwei JinDHDi HuangCLChongxiao Li

Key Points

  • RealBench reveals significant limitations in current LLMs' performance on Verilog generation tasks, with only 13.3% pass@1.
  • The benchmark supports complex, real-world IP designs and enhanced verification, indicating a step forward in hardware automation.
  • Evaluations show the necessity for stronger models, as even top-performing LLMs struggle with 0% pass rate on system-level tasks.
  • The comprehensive framework includes module-level and system-level tasks, essential for assessing real-world capabilities of LLMs.

Abstract

The automatic generation of Verilog code using Large Language Models (LLMs) has garnered significant interest in hardware design automation. However, existing benchmarks for evaluating LLMs in Verilog generation fall short in replicating real-world design workflows due to their designs' simplicity, inadequate design specifications, and less rigorous verification environments. To address these limitations, we present RealBench, the first benchmark aiming at real-world IP-level Verilog generation tasks. RealBench features complex, structured, real-world open-source IP designs, multi-modal and formatted design specifications, and rigorous verification environments, including 100% line coverage testbenches and a formal checker. It supports both module-level and system-level tasks, enabling comprehensive assessments of LLM capabilities. Evaluations on various LLMs and agents reveal that even one of the best-performing LLMs, o1-preview, achieves only a 13.3% pass@1 on module-level tasks and 0% on system-level tasks, highlighting the need for stronger Verilog generation models in the future. The benchmark is open-sourced at https://github.com/IPRC-DIP/RealBench.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jin et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d473bb31b076d99fa6c973https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2507.16200
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper