PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 24, 20250 citationsOpen Access

An Improved Algorithm for Adversarial Linear Contextual Bandits via Reduction

View Full Paper
TETim van ErvenJMJack MayoJOJulia Olkhovskaya

Key Points

  • The algorithm achieves regret of $ ilde{O}( ext{min}\{d^2\sqrt{T}, \sqrt{d^3T\log K}\})$ for linear contextual bandits.
  • This work improves upon previous methods by offering regret bounds independent of the number of actions.
  • For combinatorial bandits, the algorithm is the first to achieve $ ext{poly}(d)\sqrt{T}$ regret in polynomial time.
  • When a simulator is used, the regret can further improve to $ ilde{O}(d\sqrt{L^\star})$, enhancing performance.

Abstract

We present an efficient algorithm for linear contextual bandits with adversarial losses and stochastic action sets. Our approach reduces this setting to misspecification-robust adversarial linear bandits with fixed action sets. Without knowledge of the context distribution or access to a context simulator, the algorithm achieves O (\d²T, d³T K\) regret and runs in poly (d, C, T) time, where d is the feature dimension, C is an upper bound on the number of linear constraints defining the action set in each round, K is an upper bound on the number of actions in each round, and T is number of rounds. This resolves the open question by Liu et al. (2023) on whether one can obtain poly (d) T regret in polynomial time independent of the number of actions. For the important class of combinatorial bandits with adversarial losses and stochastic action sets where the action sets can be described by a polynomial number of linear constraints, our algorithm is the first to achieve poly (d) T regret in polynomial time, while no prior algorithm achieves even o (T) regret in polynomial time to our knowledge. When a simulator is available, the regret bound can be improved to O (dL^), where L^ is the cumulative loss of the best policy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Erven et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6e1978b2b6861e4c402c5https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2508.11931
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1LC-Tsalis-INF: Generalized Best-of-Both-Worlds Linear Contextual Bandits2024
  2. 2On the Optimal Regret of Locally Private Linear Contextual Bandit2024
  3. 3Optimal Regret with Limited Adaptivity for Generalized Linear Contextual Bandits2024
  4. 4Nearly Optimal Algorithms for Contextual Dueling Bandits from Adversarial Feedback2024
  5. 5Contextual Bandits for Unbounded Context Distributions2024