We compare two quantum approaches that use support vector machines for multi-class classification on a reduced Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) dataset: the quantum kernel-based QSVM and the Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd least-squares SVM (HHL LS-SVM). Both one-vs-rest and two-step hierarchical classification schemes were implemented. The QSVM involves angle encoding of ten features, two unitary operator blocks consisting of rotational operator gates, and a projective measurement that projects the final state to the zero state. The HHL-based method involves solving a system of linear equations using the HHL algorithm and using the solution in a support vector machine approach. The results indicate that the QSVM outperforms HHL LS-SVM in most cases. HHL LS-SVM performs somewhat competitively in selected cases, particularly when isolating galaxies (majority), however, it also performs poorly in others, especially when isolating QSOs (minority). Comparisons with classical SVMs confirm that quantum and classical methods achieve broadly similar performance, with classical models performing slightly ahead overall. Scaling analysis reveals a trade-off: QSVM performance suffers from quadratic scaling with the number of samples and features, but benefits from explicit feature representation during training, while HHL LS-SVM scales essentially constantly, with moderate fluctuations, but suffers from limited representative elements. The HHL-based method is also highly noise-sensitive. These results suggest that QSVM performs better overall and will perform better on current hardware as well, but that the more efficient scaling of HHL LS-SVM makes it a useful option for larger datasets with many samples, especially if we move past the NISQ era.
Pinheiro et al. (Fri,) studied this question.