Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 and the National Strategy for Data after removing duplicates and applying clear inclusion criteria (focus on AI or ITG, relevance to Saudi Arabia, and transparent methods), 78 were included. The review process followed PRISMA principles, with quality checks rating most evidence as moderate to high. Results show that AI can strengthen ITG by improving compliance monitoring, decision-making, and delivery of benefits. Reported outcomes include stronger governance links in empirical models, national adoption intent of about 63% of firms, projected government productivity gains of up to 56 billion a year, and a case reporting reductions of 93% in monitoring costs and 92% in accident fatalities. A comparison with EU, NIST, and OECD frameworks revealed gaps in Saudi guidance but also near-term opportunities such as creating an AI risk taxonomy, adapting impact assessment templates, and setting clearer rules for incident reporting. Limitations include reliance on mixed-quality data, policy-based estimates, and limited post-deployment evidence. Overall, the findings suggest that AI can measurably enhance ITG in Saudi Arabia when supported by risk-based obligations, lifecycle controls, and board-level oversight, providing regulators and boards with practical steps for improvement.
Fatma Abudaqqa (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: