PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2024Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports16 citationsOpen Access

Does Taking a Break Matter—Adaptations in Muscle Strength and Size Between Continuous and Periodic Resistance Training

View Full Paper
EHEeli J. HalonenIGIdda GabrielMKMilla Kelahaara

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

ABSTRACT We aimed to compare the effects of periodic resistance training (RT) and continuous RT on muscle strength and size. Fifty‐five healthy, untrained participants (age 32 ± 5 years) were randomized to periodic (PRT, n = 20 completed the study, 45% females) or continuous (CRT, n = 22 completed the study, 45% females) groups. PRT completed a 10‐week RT, a 10‐week detraining, and a second identical 10‐week RT. CRT began with a 10‐week non‐RT, followed by a 20‐week RT. RT included twice‐weekly supervised whole‐body RT sessions. Leg press (LP) and biceps curl (BC) one repetition maximum (1RM), countermovement jump (CMJ) height, muscle cross‐sectional area (CSA) of vastus lateralis (VL), and biceps brachii (BB) using ultrasound imaging were measured twice at the beginning and every fifth week during the intervention. Both groups increased ( p < 0.001) 1RM in LP and BC, CSA in VL and BB, and CMJ height with no differences between the groups. In PRT, 1RM in LP and BC, CSA in VL and BB, and CMJ height decreased during detraining ( p < 0.05). During the first 5 weeks of retraining in PRT, increases in LP 1RM, and VL and BB CSA were greater than in CRT during Weeks 10–15 of their CRT ( p < 0.01). PRT and CTR ended up in similar postintervention adaptations, as decreased muscle strength and size during detraining in PRT regained rapidly during retraining. Our results therefore suggest that trainees should not be too concerned about occasional short‐term training breaks in their daily lives when it comes to lifelong strength training. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05553769

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Halonen et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5600ee2b3180350efd528https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.14739
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper