Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This mixed-methods study investigated the role of elections in sustaining peace and stability in Zimbabwe. The study captures the diverse perspectives of electoral players and stakeholders in Zimbabwe. A comprehensive literature search informed the development of interview and questionnaire guides. Semi-structured interviews with 15 stakeholders from the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission's network and a structured questionnaire administered to 384 participants from the general population in two provinces provided valuable insights. Data analysis using NVivo and SPSS software ensured rigour and validity. The findings reveal that election success can be measured through indicators such as the absence of violence, transparency, and accountability. Competitive politics can be peaceful through cooperation and constructive dialogue among political parties. However, elections can either consolidate or compromise stability depending on the context. Power-sharing deals and independent election monitoring are crucial but present significant challenges. Power-sharing deals have a dual-edged nature, potentially mitigating or exacerbating electoral tensions. Independent election monitoring and observation are crucial in ensuring free and fair elections and promoting transparency and accountability. However, concerns about external interference and sovereignty have been raised, which has led to tensions between Zimbabwe and foreign election observers. The study highlights the importance of carefully managing the electoral process to harness its potential as a force for peace and prevent it from becoming a source of conflict. Effective management of the electoral process can promote peace and stability in Zimbabwe, and this study provides valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders.
Bernard Ngwenya - (Mon,) studied this question.