PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2024The Astrophysical Journal Letters38 citationsOpen Access

A Consistency Test of the Cosmological Model at the Epoch of Recombination Using DESI Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation and Planck Measurements

View Full Paper
LPLevon PogosianGZGong‐Bo ZhaoKJKarsten Jedamzik

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract The value of the Hubble constant determined from cosmic microwave background (CMB) and baryonic acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements is directly dependent on the sound horizon at the photon–baryon decoupling. There has been significant interest in the possibility of new physics at the epoch around recombination that could reduce the sound horizon and increase the inferred value of H 0 , thus helping to relieve the Hubble tension. One way to determine if new physics is required would be to measure H 0 from BAO and CMB without assuming any model for computing the sound horizon. In this study, we use the recently released DESI Year 1 BAO data combined with the CMB acoustic scale and the Planck ΛCDM prior on Ω m h 2 to determine H 0 while treating the sound horizon at baryon decoupling r d as a free parameter. We find H 0 = 69.48 ± 0.94 km s −1 Mpc −1 , which is ∼2 σ larger than H 0 = 67.44 ± 0.47 km s −1 Mpc −1 in the Planck best-fit ΛCDM where r d is derived using the standard recombination model. For comparison, we perform the same analysis using the pre-DESI BAO data with the CMB acoustic scale and the same prior on Ω m h 2 , finding H 0 = 68.05 ± 0.94 km s −1 Mpc −1 . This difference derives from the notably larger value of the product r d h measured by DESI. We compare results obtained with and without including the Pantheon Plus sample of uncalibrated supernovae magnitudes in our analysis. Future BAO data from DESI will help determine if the cosmological model at the epoch of recombination model requires a modification.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pogosian et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e59b44b6db6435875364cdhttps://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad7507
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Determination of the Hubble Constant and Sound Horizon from DESI Year 1 and DES Year 6 BAO Measurements and Low Redshift Data2024
  2. 2Sound-horizon-agnostic Inference of the Hubble Constant and Neutrino Masses from Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, Cosmic Microwave Background Lensing, and Galaxy Weak Lensing and Clustering2026
  3. 3Determination of the Hubble Constant and Sound Horizon from Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument Year 1 and Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Baryon Acoustic Oscillation2024 · 3 citations
  4. 4A sound horizon-free measurement of <i>H</i> <sub>0</sub> in DESI 20242025 · 13 citations
  5. 5Uncorrelated estimations of $H_0$ redshift evolution from DESI baryon acoustic oscillation observations2024 · 4 citations