The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Knee Pain

Objectives This study aimed to characterize and compare the features of traumatic and non-traumatic lesions causing knee pain through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Method The study was conducted at a tertiary care center, with data sourced from patients visiting the outpatient and in-patient departments. It involved a descriptive cross-sectional research design focusing on patients referred for knee MRI scanning. The sample size was calculated using Cochran's formula as 112 for symptomatic patients with knee pain with a 95% confidence interval. The MRI findings in 112 patients were analyzed and associated with a history of trauma. Results The average age recorded was 35.38 years. Females made up 41.07% (n=46) of the sample, while males accounted for 58.93% (n=66). Among the participants, the majority (n=82; 71.43%) had a history of trauma, and the most common MRI finding was joint effusion (n=74; 66.1%). The second most common was anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries (n=71; 63.4%), followed by meniscus injury (n=40; 35.71%). The study confirms that those with history of trauma are at a higher risk (p<0.05) of sustaining injuries like meniscus and ACL tears, collateral ligament damage, bone contusions, chondromalacia patella, and joint effusion. Conclusion In conclusion, the consistency of our findings with existing studies reinforces the pivotal role of MRI in the evaluation of knee pain. Despite its limitations, including cost and accessibility, MRI remains a gold standard for diagnosing a wide range of knee pathologies, offering unparalleled detail and accuracy that significantly enhance clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.